Monday, August 01, 2005, 04:35 pm
HP likely to stop bundling iTunes by \'06Hewlett-Packard, the world's second largest personal computer maker, will likely stop including copies of Apple's iTunes software on its computers later this year following a failed iPod licensing partnership with the Cupertino, Calif.-based iPod maker.
This recent assertion comes from analyst Shaw Wu of American Technology Research, who in a research note today cited industry and channel sources in saying that "HP will likely not bundle iTunes with its desktops and laptops by the end of this calendar year."
Instead, Wu is lead to believe that HP will soon abandon iTunes as its default music player in favor of forming a new relationship with Microsoft and its Windows Media Player technology.
Following a Friday Wall Street Journal web report, HP said it would stop reselling Apple's iPod digital music players around the end of September amid disagreements over finances and the company's digital strategies. A company spokesman was quoted as saying that HP would continue bundling iTunes on its desktop and notebook PCs for the time being.
The initial response to the fallout by analyst and industry followers was one of mild to little concern, considering HP accounted for just 5% of total iPod sales since entering into the partnership with Apple. However, the partnership enabled Apple's industry-leading iTunes music service to reach millions of Windows users every year; a move by HP to remove iTunes from its desktops may affect Apple's reach and ultimately its marketshare.
As part of the original agreement between the two companies, formed in January 2004, HP agreed to install Apple's iTunes music jukebox software on its computers in exchange for the rights to resell Apple's iPod digital music players.
The partnership was initially greeted with much fanfare because HP's 100,000 plus retail outlets worldwide offered the potential to dramatically expanding the iPods reach in international markets where Apple was not present.
"Unfortunately, the partnership barely got off the ground. Its impossible to say whose fault it wasApples or HPs," said Needham Co. analyst Charles Wolf. "HPs strategy to enhance the iPod with brightly colored paper covers was hardly consistent with the companys desired image of an innovative company. And despite the opportunity to sell the iPod abroad in markets Apple could not reach, HP appears to have confined its sales to US retailers."
Apple apparently saw little need for the redundancy HP was forming in its iPod distribution channels, and because it did not offer the PC maker any price protection on the players, easily overtook those markets in which HP had formed inroads.
"The relationship between Apple and HP undoubtedly deteriorated when Apple began to expand the iPods presence into retail outlets, such as Radio Shack and Wal-Mart, that already stocked HPs version of the product," Wolf said. "With HP and Apple selling in many of the same stores, HPs incremental contribution was probably close to zero."
But will a decision by HP to stop placing iTunes on its computers in lieu of a more versatile Microsoft solution further open the door for the iPod's many competitors in addition to a Microsoft music store?
HP, which is prohibited from reselling or developing a competitive music player until August 2006 under its original agreement with Apple, is not likely invest in marketing a new player of its own. Instead, the company appears focused on a digital strategy centered around digital printing and imaging.
Representatives for HP were unavailable for comment.
On Topic: General
- Google reportedly mulling $1B Waze bid, could spark bidding war with Facebook
- Rumor: Apple outlines new in-house repair policy in note to Brazilian AASPs
- Apple: Samsung shirked FRAND obligations, filed suit before making a licensing offer
- Apple announces WWDC 2013 keynote for Monday, June 10
- Apple on pace to double lobbying spending on taxes, other issues