Never miss an update Follow AppleInsider
Thursday, September 22, 2005, 04:55 pm
Cingular and Apple may team on music download service
Cingular Wireless, the No. 1 U.S. wireless carrier, hopes to team with Apple next year when it launches a service that will let users download music on their mobile phone, a senior executive said on Thursday.The service would likely charge "slightly higher" than what consumers pay for songs on Apple's iTunes service, Ralph de la Vega, chief operating officer at Cingular, said on the sidelines of a Goldman Sachs investor conference in New York.
Earlier this month, Apple along with Motorola introduced a new mobile handset called ROKR, which is the first cell phone to offer music playback through an embedded version of iTunes. Cingular is the first service provider to carry the phone.
Details regarding how the service would be run were still being worked out, according to Reuters, but de la Vega did say that he hoped it could be done in partnership with Apple.
Asked about demand for the ROKR, de la Vega said the company was making sales, but noted that "it takes a little while to build."
In the two weeks it has been available, the ROKR has failed to impress reviewers, consumers or the media. Fortune columnist Peter Lewis even went as far as calling the ROKR a "STINKR."
In his review of the phone, Lewis, like others, speculates that Apple may have intentionally crippled the ROKR.
"Apple has a good thing going with the iPod, and perhaps it didn't care to see the ROKR get good enough to kill that action."
If Apple and Cingular expanded their partnership to cover the new service, it would almost certainly yield the first mobile version of Apple's iTunes Music Store, allowing Cingular customers to shop for music from their mobile phone.
On Topic: General
- Judge says evidence will likely show Apple culpable in e-book price fixing case
- Google reportedly mulling $1B Waze bid, could spark bidding war with Facebook
- Rumor: Apple outlines new in-house repair policy in note to Brazilian AASPs
- Apple: Samsung shirked FRAND obligations, filed suit before making a licensing offer
- Apple announces WWDC 2013 keynote for Monday, June 10
Previous Comments View All
Quote:
Originally posted by CosmoNut
This "report" completely flies in the face of this article from MacCentral, in which Steve Jobs apparently said the opposite:
I'm thinking I'm going to believe MacCentral here. Sorry Kasper.
\
This "report" completely flies in the face of this article from MacCentral, in which Steve Jobs apparently said the opposite:
I'm thinking I'm going to believe MacCentral here. Sorry Kasper.
\I'm not convinced with Job's reasoning in entirety. Yes, if you lose your phone without synching, you lose the music, but if you simply damaged the old phone, buy a new phone that reads the same memory card type, then you should be able to swap cards.
Personally, I don't "get" the mobile phone market. I understand the desirability of having mobile service, but the upscale stuff is weird to me. The amount of money carriers charge for backgrounds, ring tones, games and such is IMO absurd, and very often, they "expire" in 90-180 days.
Sounds like Cingular and Apple are not seeing eye to eye on the future of music sales on mobile phones.
No wonder steve biffed the ROKR demo. 'Oops I pressed the wrong button.' 
The ROKR is lame, no question about it. Motorola could have done better.
It will be interesting to see what phones are next. Maybe the Laser?
If it held a minimum of 500 songs it would be much better.
Till then I believe people will be much happier with a nano in one pocket and there phone in the other.
I've had the ROCKR for about a week or so. The 100 song limitation isn't the problem...think about it, that's like the same as a 6 CD changer one might have in their car.
The problems are...
1) The camera sucks (VGA resolution with poor imaging and compression).
2) You can't play AAC files greater than 128kbps. This means that if you have higher bitrate AAC files, you have to select "convert to 128kbps AAC". The problem is that it will then convert *all* songs on the phone...even MP3s.
3) It's USB 1.1 and as such takes about 1 hour to transfer all the songs.
4) While you can make a iTunes song a ringtone, it's not an easy process (many people think you can't, but you can).
5) You can't do different ringtones for different callers.
6) The audio quality of the phone for music is rather poor. It does work great for phone calls on speaker phone, but for music the built in speakers suck, and the music isn't much better with headphones.
--EDIT-- I forgot to add 7) The phone not only doesn't charge when connected via USB, but you can't connect via USB *and* plug in the charger at the same time.
Originally I was going to return the phone, but I think I'll keep it and use it for podcasts.
I'm hoping that with enough protest, they will release a better phone soon.
Quote:
Originally posted by macslut
I've had the ROCKR for about a week or so. The 100 song limitation isn't the problem...think about it, that's like the same as a 6 CD changer one might have in their car.
The problems are...
1) The camera sucks (VGA resolution with poor imaging and compression).
2) You can't play AAC files greater than 128kbps. This means that if you have higher bitrate AAC files, you have to select "convert to 128kbps AAC". The problem is that it will then convert *all* songs on the phone...even MP3s.
3) It's USB 1.1 and as such takes about 1 hour to transfer all the songs.
4) While you can make a iTunes song a ringtone, it's not an easy process (many people think you can't, but you can).
5) You can't do different ringtones for different callers.
6) The audio quality of the phone for music is rather poor. It does work great for phone calls on speaker phone, but for music the built in speakers suck, and the music isn't much better with headphones.
Originally I was going to return the phone, but I think I'll keep it and use it for podcasts.
I'm hoping that with enough protest, they will release a better phone soon.
I've had the ROCKR for about a week or so. The 100 song limitation isn't the problem...think about it, that's like the same as a 6 CD changer one might have in their car.
The problems are...
1) The camera sucks (VGA resolution with poor imaging and compression).
2) You can't play AAC files greater than 128kbps. This means that if you have higher bitrate AAC files, you have to select "convert to 128kbps AAC". The problem is that it will then convert *all* songs on the phone...even MP3s.
3) It's USB 1.1 and as such takes about 1 hour to transfer all the songs.
4) While you can make a iTunes song a ringtone, it's not an easy process (many people think you can't, but you can).
5) You can't do different ringtones for different callers.
6) The audio quality of the phone for music is rather poor. It does work great for phone calls on speaker phone, but for music the built in speakers suck, and the music isn't much better with headphones.
Originally I was going to return the phone, but I think I'll keep it and use it for podcasts.
I'm hoping that with enough protest, they will release a better phone soon.
Motorola phones are hardly anything special -what was everyone expecting? Yes your concerns are more valid than most because you take into account that 100 songs isn't bad (the phone isn't designed for those with iPods remember). BUT Motorola always lack basic features which is why I didn't get the V3 RAZR and got the S700i
Quote:
Originally posted by CosmoNut
This "report" completely flies in the face of this article from MacCentral, in which Steve Jobs apparently said the opposite:
I'm thinking I'm going to believe MacCentral here. Sorry Kasper.
\
This "report" completely flies in the face of this article from MacCentral, in which Steve Jobs apparently said the opposite:
I'm thinking I'm going to believe MacCentral here. Sorry Kasper.
\I don't agree. I read both reports. Jobs DIDN'T say that it wouldn't work. He also didn't say that ALL carriers wouldn't do this. And he didn't say that Apple and Cingular WEREN'T in discussions about this. You know how he likes to misdirect until the last monent.
Like "we won't compete in the low cost computer market", and out pops the Mini.
Etc.
Quote:
Originally posted by JeffDM
....Personally, I don't "get" the mobile phone market. I understand the desirability of having mobile service, but the upscale stuff is weird to me. The amount of money carriers charge for backgrounds, ring tones, games and such is IMO absurd, and very often, they "expire" in 90-180 days.
....Personally, I don't "get" the mobile phone market. I understand the desirability of having mobile service, but the upscale stuff is weird to me. The amount of money carriers charge for backgrounds, ring tones, games and such is IMO absurd, and very often, they "expire" in 90-180 days.
jeff, do you mean "upsell" instead of "upscale"? but yeah, i don't get it either. people who use computers regularly don't get paying for all this background, ring tone, game stuff... by the time you pay for all this crap plus your text message and calls, bloody hell, your phone bill ain't fun to look at.
Quote:
Originally posted by melgross
Like "we won't compete in the low cost computer market", and out pops the Mini.
Like "we won't compete in the low cost computer market", and out pops the Mini.
Probably just picking here, but I wouldn't call the Mini a low cost computer solution. Yes, it's only $500 (or $600... or $700...) until you realize that it's only a box! Assuming you're wanting to buy all-Apple products, the cheapest display listed on the US Apple store is $800. If you're willing to go with other brands or have an Apple store nearby, you can probably pick up a 15" monitor for about $200. If cost is the issue, you'd probably be better off with an eMac (which also comes with the $30 each Apple mouse and keyboard), not the Mac Mini. Or pay the extra $200 and get an iBook. I've come to think of the Mac Mini as a transitional tool for the PC user who's not quite ready to switch but is curious what all the fuss is about.
That and as a cooler looking desktop!
Quote:
Originally posted by jdbartlett
Probably just picking here, but I wouldn't call the Mini a low cost computer solution. Yes, it's only $500 (or $600... or $700...) until you realize that it's only a box! Assuming you're wanting to buy all-Apple products, the cheapest display listed on the US Apple store is $800. If you're willing to go with other brands or have an Apple store nearby, you can probably pick up a 15" monitor for about $200. If cost is the issue, you'd probably be better off with an eMac (which also comes with the $30 each Apple mouse and keyboard), not the Mac Mini. Or pay the extra $200 and get an iBook. I've come to think of the Mac Mini as a transitional tool for the PC user who's not quite ready to switch but is curious what all the fuss is about.
That and as a cooler looking desktop!
Probably just picking here, but I wouldn't call the Mini a low cost computer solution. Yes, it's only $500 (or $600... or $700...) until you realize that it's only a box! Assuming you're wanting to buy all-Apple products, the cheapest display listed on the US Apple store is $800. If you're willing to go with other brands or have an Apple store nearby, you can probably pick up a 15" monitor for about $200. If cost is the issue, you'd probably be better off with an eMac (which also comes with the $30 each Apple mouse and keyboard), not the Mac Mini. Or pay the extra $200 and get an iBook. I've come to think of the Mac Mini as a transitional tool for the PC user who's not quite ready to switch but is curious what all the fuss is about.
That and as a cooler looking desktop!
As you know, it's not meant for the new buyer as a low cost unit. It's meant for the user who wants to upgrade from an older Mac but can't (or won't) spend the mony, and so has a monitor, keyboard and mouse already.
The same thing for the PC switcher who has the above items.
Low cost is relative. An $800 Dell is low cost. you can do that with this if you want even if you get the $600 model. A 17" crt is less than $100 today. The Apple keyboard is $50. And you can pick up a scroll mouse for $15-25.
It doesn't mean that this is competing against the cheapest stuff out there. Just the low cost stuff.
It's like a few years ago with cars. you could buy a low cost Hyundai, or you could get a Yugo.
Apple is competing against the Hyundai, but not the Yugo.
already straying from topic so i'll be quick: i wonder if anyone has anywhere the stats on what percentage of people buying a mac mini already have an existing KDM to BYO. such stats/lies/damned-lies would shed insight on how apple is positioning tha mini.
Latest Apple Headlines
-
AT&T to reportedly add Apple's iPhone to GoPhone prepaid lineup
~2 hours ago -
Apple airs new iPhone ad, continues brilliant 'quiet' TV campaign
~2 hours ago -
Google reportedly mulling $1B Waze bid, could spark bidding war with Facebook
~6 hours ago -
Apple expands iOS Maps' 3D Flyover coverage of California
~7 hours ago -
Rumor: Apple outlines new in-house repair policy in note to Brazilian AASPs
~8 hours ago - more...
Want to write for AppleInsider? Submit your application now!
Lowest Prices Anywhere!
| Model | Price | You Save |
|---|---|---|
| Core i5 MacBook Pros w/ Retina | ||
| 13" 2.5GHz/8GB/128GB | $1,406.48 | $292.52 |
| 13" 2.5GHz/8GB/256GB | $1,479.99 | $519.01 |
| 13" 2.5GHz/8GB/512GB | $1,699.99 | $799.01 |
| Core i7 MacBook Pros w/ Retina | ||
| 13" 2.9GHz/8GB/256GB | $1,599.99 | $599.01 |
| 13" 2.9GHz/8GB/512GB | $1,799.99 | $899.01 |
| 15" 2.3GHz/8GB/256GB | $1,899.99 | $299.01 |
| 15" 2.6GHz/8GB/512GB | $2,299.99 | $568.01 |
| 15" 2.7GHz/16GB/768GB | $2,699.99 | $499.01 |
| Model | White | Black | |
|---|---|---|---|
| iPad mini (WiFi only) | |||
| 16GB WiFi |  |
$329.99 | $329.99 |
| 32GB WiFi | |
$429.99 | $429.99 |
| 64GB WiFi | |
$529.99 | $529.99 |
| iPad mini (WiFi + 4G) | |||
 |
 |
 |
|
| 16GB 4G White | $459.99 | $459.99 | $459.99 |
| 32GB 4G White | $559.99 | $559.99 | $559.99 |
| 64GB 4G White | $659.99 | $659.99 | $659.99 |
| 16GB 4G Black | $459.99 | $459.99 | $459.99 |
| 32GB 4G Black | $559.99 | $559.99 | $559.99 |
| 64GB 4G Black | $659.99 | $659.99 | $659.99 |
This "report" completely flies in the face of this article from MacCentral, in which Steve Jobs apparently said the opposite:
Im not convinced that it will be successful, said Jobs. The network providers will charge a lot to download music to a mobile maybe US$3.
Jobs also reasoned that a computer would still be required even if a mobile user downloaded music directly onto their mobile phone.
You will have to backup the music on your phone up using your PC, said Jobs. If you lose a phone then you lose all your music. If you get a new phone you have to transfer it all. Its not clear that buying music over the air makes economic sense.
I'm thinking I'm going to believe MacCentral here. Sorry Kasper.