Thursday, August 03, 2006, 10:25 pm
Apple may need to restate historical financial statements
Apple Computer has discovered additional evidence of irregularities relating to past stock option grants and will likely need to restate its historical financial statements as a result, the company said on Thursday.In late June, Apple proactively announced that an internal investigation discovered irregularities related to the issuance of certain stock option grants made between 1997 and 2001.
The company notified the SEC of the irregularities and a special committee of its outside directors immediately hired independent counsel to perform an internal investigation.
"Although the investigation is ongoing, the Company has discovered additional evidence of irregularities," Apple said in an updated statement on Thursday. "In light of this, management has concluded, and the audit committee of the board of directors agrees, that the Company will likely need to restate its historical financial statements to record non-cash charges for compensation expense relating to past stock option grants."
Apple said it has not determined the amount of such charges, the resulting tax and accounting impact, or which periods may require restatement. Accordingly, the company on Thursday filed a Form 8-K with the SEC, stating that its financial statements and all earnings and press releases and similar communications relating to periods commencing on September 29, 2002 should therefore not be relied upon.
As a result of the ongoing investigation, Apple said it will also delay the filing of its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 1, 2006.
"[Apple] is focused on resolving these issues as quickly as possible and plans to file its Form 10-Q and any required restated financial statements following completion of the investigation," the company added.
Last month, investors on behalf of the company filed two separate lawsuits in California courts charging current and former company executives and directors with colluding to backdate stock options in order to maximize their profits.
On Topic: General
- Apple's iWatch to come in late 2014 with focus on biometrics, analyst says
- Apple software update brings QuickTime for Windows to 7.7.4
- With spotlight on it & Apple, Ireland calls for worldwide tax crackdown
- Former Gartner analyst Michael Gartenberg joins Apple marketing
- Sony to consider spinning off its entertainment division




Want to write for AppleInsider? Submit your application now!



It's an accounting problem that Apple will have to work through. If they are the ones that discovered the problem then I see no real legal problems ahead.
Let's face it, there will be no changes in unit sales for anything - be it Macs, iPods, songs, you name it. The gross margins will be the same, as will the huge cash holdings. Well, the cash holdings may increase a bit - if net income goes down for some of the previous years then there will be tax refunds . . .
What this does bring forward is the need for Apple to deliver some very good product news at WWDC. Because of the similar pricing and socket compatibility of Core 2 I can see Apple shifting everything possible to Core 2 ASAP, with multiple announcements by Steve J.
To me, the smart investor will be more interested in where Apple is today and where they are going tomorrow. Core 2 at WWDC can impact the smart investor, as can a strong Leopard presentation with a lot of new features the average consumer will pay for. Follow up with new iPods in Paris and maybe even the iPhone and history will not be that important.