Friday, March 21, 2008, 10:00 am
Gartner's change of heart over iPhone in the enterprise
Market research firm Gartner, which had previously shunned Apple Inc.'s iPhone as a consumer-oriented tablet device not fit for the enterprise, has changed its stance.Analysts for the firm were among those who expressed concern over some security issues immediately following its release, but in a statement this week said a more enterprise-friendly version of the handset's firmware and other planned security enhancements warrants an updated recommendation.
Following the release of those improvements as part of iPhone software v2.0 this June, Gartner said it will endorse the handset under appliance-level support status, which permits the device to be used for PIM, e-mail, telephony and browsing applications. It would also deem the device fit to be used for other dedicated functions where the software is supplied by a third party, functionality is kept to a restricted set, the software supplier offers support for a backup platform, and IT development resources are not needed to program custom code locally residing on the device.
In its initial release, the iPhone was, with few exceptions, an Internet tablet with browser-based applications as its main offering, however, the release of firmware 2.0 changes that, enabling enterprises to develop local code and create applications that do not depend on network capabilities, said Gartner analyst and vice president Ken Dulaney. The iPhone will thus match up initially in several segments against its main smartphone competitors BlackBerry, Windows Mobile and Symbian Series 60.
Earlier this month Apple announced an iPhone Software Developers Kit (SDK) that will allow third-parties to develop proprietary applications for v2.0 of the iPhone software. The Cupertino-based firm also said that it had licensed Microsoft's ActiveSync protocol suite, and was adding support for Cisco IPSEC and WPA2 security for Wi-Fi connections.
By licensing Exchange ActiveSync and exposing its basic security policies, enterprises can provide sufficient security for iPhone during Exchange personal information manager (PIM) and e-mail use, Dulaney said. This will open up a huge market for the iPhone, which previously had been stymied by a lack of basic business security and application functionality. However, Apple must widen distribution and of course deliver what they have promised.
iPhones trickling into the enterprise would also likely have a residual affect on Apple's brand awareness amongst corporate employees, which could spur additive sales, according to Gartner. But at the same time, the firm said this will push enterprises to invest in technologies with which they are unfamiliar and that require training and further investment.
Management of the iPhone outside the Exchange e-mail/PIM application will require familiarity with new products such as Apples iPhone Configuration Utility," Dulaney said. "And enterprises should thoroughly review the platforms management and security options to understand how they can control any consumer elements of the platform that may pose a risk."
On Topic: iPhone
- iPhone urinalysis app draws scrutiny from FDA
- Best Buy to offer $50 off all iPhone 5 & 4S models starting Sunday
- New service delivers passes for Apple's Passbook via text message
- AT&T to reportedly add Apple's iPhone to GoPhone prepaid lineup
- Apple airs new iPhone ad, continues brilliant 'quiet' TV campaign



ngngnghh



Want to write for AppleInsider? Submit your application now!



WOOT first post (why are so many people excited about this?)
On to business -- maybe I'm confused, I thought that apple had one of the best secruity records around. I know, I know they're a small target, and aren't hit with the full fury of the window's ghetto, but still its more a listing of their responsiveness to percieved threats -- rarely more than a 30 day response time, and often within 7 for genuine threats.
That all being said, why are the analysts so sure about the iPhone either way. If I recally correctly, the bad security accusations were coming out before the iPhone -- making it a blind guess. Now its all good, months before the application is upgraded. If I recally correctly, security holes are subtle things, aka if it was obvious, the programmers would have patched them. How does an analyst know whether they're there? Do they have the best hackers in the world?
if they do, are they plotting something?
what are they plotting?
I'm getting out the tinfoil hat.