Never miss an update Follow AppleInsider
Monday, May 04, 2009, 09:50 pm
MacBooks sweep latest Consumer Reports scores
By Katie Marsal
div align="center">img src="http://images.appleinsider.com/consumerreports.png" border="0" alt="Consumer Reports®" />/div>On Topic: MacBook
- Upgraded MacBook models expected to highlight WWDC 2013
- AI readers now get lowest prices on Apple's iMacs & MacBooks with new coupons
- AI readers now get lowest prices on Apple's iMacs & MacBooks with new coupons
- Apple extends MacBook bottom case replacement program by two years
- MacBook firmware updates address inadvertent battery shutdown issue
Today's' Headlines
Related Articles
- Apple's MacBooks sweep Consumer Reports laptop rankings
- Briefly: More sightings of mysterious metallic grey MacBooks
- Consumer Reports declares Apple's new MacBook Air top of class
- Refurb unibody MacBooks and MacBook Pros at Apple Store
- New iPad impressing more buyers, tops Consumer Reports tablet picks
Previous Comments View All
Did they include a variable for cost?
If they didnt, this report shows pretty much what everyone already knew, and Microsoft covers in their adverts. Tehy are great, cool, blah blah blah, they are just expensive...
The main point, for the average consumer, is the extra 11 points worth 1300$?
To some, it will be. To the majority, cost is a major factor.
Those fools at Consumer Reports were tricked by the "pretty cases" on computers that have the "same guts" as every other computer. Don't they know Macs are for "idiots who can't operate a PC"?
I hope Consumer Reports made it clear that Macs aren't for technically savvy people. They're just for people who need a simple computer. You can't do anything complex with UNIX. Just surf and email photos.

while the 20-inch iMac's 70 was enough to earn a runner-up position behind the Dell XPS One 24.
Can I assume this is a typo?

Those fools at Consumer Reports were tricked by the "pretty cases" on computers that have the "same guts" as every other computer. Don't they know Macs are for "idiots who can't operate a PC"?
I hope Consumer Reports made it clear that Macs aren't for technically savvy people. They're just for people who need a simple computer. You can't do anything complex with UNIX. Just surf and email photos.
That is just too funny!! Wow, can't do anything but surf and email photos??!! That is SO original!! Can't do anything complex with UNIX??!! That's even funnier! I am sure some UNIX programmers may want to chime in with their two cents worth on that subject. Good luck living in the land of the blind.
Apple's iMac line will continue to get bested by Dell's XPS One as long as Apple continues to use mobile processors. I assume that the next models will get the desktop-greade LV C2Q that Intel made for AIOs. They are still more expensive than the processor Dell uses but it does offer more performance than the notebook-grade CPUs Apple currently uses while being significantly cheaper.
Dell XPS One 24" - Q8200 (4M L2 cache, 4 Cores, 4 Threads, 2.33 GHz 1333 MHz FSB 45nm) - $163
Apple iMac 24" - P9600 (6M L2 cache, 2 Cores, 2 Threads, 2.66 GHz 1066 MHz FSB 45nm) - $348

Those fools at Consumer Reports were tricked by the "pretty cases" on computers that have the "same guts" as every other computer. Don't they know Macs are for "idiots who can't operate a PC"?
I hope Consumer Reports made it clear that Macs aren't for technically savvy people. They're just for people who need a simple computer. You can't do anything complex with UNIX. Just surf and email photos.
if they are technically savvy, they can figure that out.

Did they include a variable for cost?
If they didnt, this report shows pretty much what everyone already knew, and Microsoft covers in their adverts. Tehy are great, cool, blah blah blah, they are just expensive...
The main point, for the average consumer, is the extra 11 points worth 1300$?
To some, it will be. To the majority, cost is a major factor.
They usually pick an item from each category that takes into account the price. This usually isn't at the top of the ratings.
Latest Apple Headlines
-
Judge says evidence will likely show Apple culpable in e-book price fixing case
~5 hours ago -
AT&T to reportedly add Apple's iPhone to GoPhone prepaid lineup
~6 hours ago -
Apple airs new iPhone ad, continues brilliant 'quiet' TV campaign
~7 hours ago -
Google reportedly mulling $1B Waze bid, could spark bidding war with Facebook
~11 hours ago -
Apple expands iOS Maps' 3D Flyover coverage of California
~12 hours ago - more...
Lowest Prices Anywhere!
| Model | Price | You Save |
|---|---|---|
| Core i5 MacBook Pros w/ Retina | ||
| 13" 2.5GHz/8GB/128GB | $1,406.48 | $292.52 |
| 13" 2.5GHz/8GB/256GB | $1,479.99 | $519.01 |
| 13" 2.5GHz/8GB/512GB | $1,699.99 | $799.01 |
| Core i7 MacBook Pros w/ Retina | ||
| 13" 2.9GHz/8GB/256GB | $1,599.99 | $599.01 |
| 13" 2.9GHz/8GB/512GB | $1,799.99 | $899.01 |
| 15" 2.3GHz/8GB/256GB | $1,899.99 | $299.01 |
| 15" 2.6GHz/8GB/512GB | $2,299.99 | $568.01 |
| 15" 2.7GHz/16GB/768GB | $2,699.99 | $499.01 |
Active Forum Topics
-
New Microsoft Windows 8 ad turns Apple's Siri against her maker
138
-
Google's new 3D Maps destroy Manhattan in the wake of Apple's Flyover
75
-
Microsoft caught lying about tablet size in comparison to Apple's iPad
49
-
Apple on pace to double lobbying spending on taxes, other issues
35
-
Apple announces WWDC 2013 keynote for Monday, June 10
35
- more...
| Model | White | Black | |
|---|---|---|---|
| iPad mini (WiFi only) | |||
| 16GB WiFi | $329.99 | $329.99 | |
| 32GB WiFi | $429.99 | $429.99 | |
| 64GB WiFi | $529.99 | $529.99 | |
| iPad mini (WiFi + 4G) | |||
![]() |
|||
| 16GB 4G White | $459.99 | $459.99 | $459.99 |
| 32GB 4G White | $559.99 | $559.99 | $559.99 |
| 64GB 4G White | $659.99 | $659.99 | $659.99 |
| 16GB 4G Black | $459.99 | $459.99 | $459.99 |
| 32GB 4G Black | $559.99 | $559.99 | $559.99 |
| 64GB 4G Black | $659.99 | $659.99 | $659.99 |



Want to write for AppleInsider? Submit your application now!


Now let's see if all the Apple trolls on here who constantly deny and make up excuses for AT&T, that it is at the bottom of carriers as reported by Consumer Reports, will now back up this claim instead. Such hypocrisy!