Brazilian lawsuit accuses Apple of 'planned obsolescence' with fourth-gen iPadApple's legal troubles in Brazil grew on Thursday, as news emerged that the company has been hit with a class-action suit alleging that the quick release of the fourth-generation iPad constitutes "planned obsolescence" with regard to its predecessor.
Brazil's Jornal do Comérciao [Google translation via MacMagazine.com.br] reports that the Brazilian Institute of Politics and Law Software (IBDI) has filed suit against the iPad maker, claiming that the company could have, when launching the third-generation "New iPad," implemented all of the technological upgrades it introduced in the fourth-generation model. Apple's failure to do so, the suit alleges, amounts to planned obsolescence and unfair business practices.
"Consumers thought [they were] buying high-end equipment," said IBDI attorney Sergio Palomares, "not knowing [it] was already an obsolete version."
If Apple is found guilty of unfair business practices, the company could be forced to compensate all Brazilian customers who bought the third-generation iPad.
The newest model of iPad debuted in October alongside the iPad mini. The new model was largely acknowledged as an incremental upgrade to the third-gen model, which it replaced after only six months. Following the introduction of the fourth-gen iPad, some Apple Stores began allowing customers to exchange their slightly older models for slightly newer ones, though this was not a nationwide company policy.
The newer iPad does offer a faster A6X processor, a FaceTime HD camera, and a port compatible with Apple's new Lightning connector standard. These are the features, the IBDI suit claims, that could have been built into the third-generation model.
The IBDI suit isn't Apple's only worry in Latin America's biggest market. The company also faces a struggle over rights to the iPhone brand in the country, having lost the right to the trademark after a court found in favor of Gradiente Electronica, a company that first registered the iPhone trademark in 2000.
On Topic: lawsuits
- Federal appeals court declines to stay Smartflash case against Apple
- Google, Facebook, others push for rehearing over damages in Apple v. Samsung patent case
- Lawsuit over Apple Store employee bag checks becomes class action covering over 12,000 workers
- Lawsuit targets Apple for directing 'iWatch' Google searches to Apple Watch page
- Judge tosses Smartflash's $533M victory against Apple, damages to be retried