Amidst backlash, Apple has purged most of the Wordle clones from the App Store

The genuine Wordle is played through a browser, not an app

Apple appears to have removed most of the unlicensed Wordle game clones that had been flooding the App Store.

Following an outcry about the free word-guessing Wordle game being cloned for profit by multiple app developers, the majority have been removed. Google has seemingly also removed many from the Google Play Store.

Neither company has announced the move, which has seem the blatant ripoffs purged. These include the unofficial "Wordle - the App," by Zach Shakked, which took creator Josh Wardle's free web game and charged users $30 per month.

The clones have been downloaded tens of thousands of times, and may have been the impetus for the purge. Shakked, who has previously decried app copycats, also publicly boasted about how well his clone was doing.

Apple's App Store Guidelines preclude such clones, though each one was originally passed as approved by the company's app curators. Apple has previously been criticized for allowing copycat apps, but it appears to have retrospectively taken steps to prevent this particular spate of them.

Follow AppleInsider on Google News

5 Comments

michelb76

said about 2 years ago

Hopefully Apple will take a harder line with clones and copycats. There are still SO MANY in the store it's unbelievable, and most of them with absolutely scammy subscriptions. And if 20 random twitter users can point them out, so can the people currently failing at curating.

Doodpants

said about 2 years ago

Wordle itself is a clone of a game that has existed for many years and in many forms under the name "Lingo", so it's not like it gets to claim the moral high ground on originality.

jungmark

said about 2 years ago

I downloaded Wordle the app and then I saw the original app was browser based. I then deleted it and went to the browser.

Cheap knockoff devs should be suspended.

davidw

said about 2 years ago

michelb76 said:

Hopefully Apple will take a harder line with clones and copycats. There are still SO MANY in the store it's unbelievable, and most of them with absolutely scammy subscriptions. And if 20 random twitter users can point them out, so can the people currently failing at curating.

But can 20 random twitter users determine the original, out of dozens of "clones" and "copycats" apps? It's going to take way more than 20 random twitter users to come up with 1 that can. That's the hard part of being a curator. Apple curator can easily spot all the similar apps but it's going to be hard to determine which are clones and copycats and which one is the original or an original. Just because an app is first to be in the Apple App Store, it doesn't make it an original. If Apple curator were to stick with only "an original" can be in the Apple App Store, then Warble free web based "Wordle", would also be banned. He might have been first to name the word game "Wordle", but the word game itself is not an original. It's still a clone or copycat, of a prior popular 80's word game, "Lingo". And "Lingo" itself, might not be an original.

How would an Apple App Store curator know whether an app that appears to be a "clone" or "copycat" of Wordle, isn't a clone or copycat of "Lingo". Like what "Wordle" is to begin with?

williamlondon

said about 2 years ago

michelb76 said:

Hopefully Apple will take a harder line with clones and copycats. There are still SO MANY in the store it's unbelievable, and most of them with absolutely scammy subscriptions. And if 20 random twitter users can point them out, so can the people currently failing at curating.

Another negatively framed post, and first one a la MacRumors, couldn't appreciate the sun today without complaining about the clouds on the horizon.