Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Apple appeals $625.5 million ruling in Cover Flow patent dispute

Apple has officially appealed a patent violation ruling issued last week, challenging a jury's decision to award $625.5 million to a company for infringement related to Spotlight, Cover Flow and Time Machine.

Last week it was revealed that Mirror Worlds LLC won a lawsuit filed in 2008 that accused Apple of infringing on three patents it owns. The patent holder was awarded $625.5 million by a jury in a Tyler County Court in Eastern Texas.

But according to Bloomberg, Apple has asked the court for an emergency stay from the ruling, arguing that Mirror Worlds would be "triple dipping" in collecting $208.5 million on each of the patents. Apple is attempting to convince the court that there are outstanding issues with two of the patents.

Presiding over the case, U.S. District Judge Leonard Davis has asked the lawyers on each side to submit legal arguments on the damages awarded by the Tyler County jury. Apple called an assertion by Mirror Worlds that the damages should be cumulative "erroneous and objectionable."

Apple has also requested that the court find Apple is not infringing on two of the patents. Judge Davis reportedly said if he granted Apple's request, he would strike the amount of damages attributed to those two patents.

The lawsuit accused Apple of infringing on patents for creating "streams" of documents sorted by time. The patents were originally filed for by Yale professor David Gelernter in 1999, who said he believes Apple's Spotlight, Time Machine and Cover Flow features were taken from his ideas on "lifesreaming."



51 Comments

goldenclaw 15 Years · 272 comments

Does that really say $625 million?

That seems huge and excessive. The lawyers must be celebrating right now, they're making enough to retire off of.

sapporobabyrtrns 16 Years · 844 comments

Quote:
Originally Posted by Goldenclaw

Does that really say $625 million?

That seems huge and excessive. The lawyers must be celebrating right now, they're making enough to retire off of.

Right. if it was the other way around there would be dancing in the streets. I hope this verdict sticks. No one is above the law.

slang4art 16 Years · 376 comments

Quote:
Originally Posted by sapporobabyrtrns

Right. if it was the other way around there would be dancing in the streets. I hope this verdict sticks. No one is above the law.

You must not follow these East Texas patent trials very closely. Or other information relating to how Apple acquired Cover Flow.

lightstriker 17 Years · 457 comments

$625 Million? Apple might as well just spill hot coffee on them.

wurm5150 15 Years · 763 comments

Software patent violation for $625M.. I think that is really excessive. Two of these patents are on how something is displayed, is questionable, and something not worth 9 figures. Apple will probably end up paying 100-200..