The Consumer Electronics Show this week marks the official introduction of Intel's newly redesigned processors, which are the first to combine visual and 3D graphics technology along with microprocessors on the same chip. The product line, codenamed "Sandy Bridge," features newly architected Intel HD Graphics on each 32nm die for significant performance improvements over previous generation graphics.
While Intel's latest family of chips, featuring a major redesign, will inevitably arrive in future Macs from Apple, hackers this week wasted no time to install Mac OS X on a Sandy Bridge processor. As noted by Engadget, Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard was installed onto a "Hackintosh" machine running the Intel Core i5-2500K CPU, with a clock speed of 3.30GHz.
The system, running Snow Leopard, achieved a Geekbench Score of 8874 and an Xbench score of 282.40, boosted in part by 6MB of L3 cache in the Sandy Bridge chip. The feat was achieved by utilizing a patched kernel, and the process was detailed by the blog tonymacx86 after Intel lifted their non-disclosure agreement for those with early access to the new processors.
"Until Apple uses these CPUs, it's a bit of a science experiment, as you'll need to use a 'patched' non-standard Darwin kernel in order to boot the system," the blog reads.
While Intel is prepared to officially unveil its second-generation Core processor family during CES Press Day on Wednesday, the company did issue a press release earlier this week touting some of the features of its newly redesigned line of chips. The chipmaker said more than 500 desktop and laptop PCs are expected from all major computer manufacturers throughout 2011.
"The new 2nd Generation Intel Core processors represent the biggest advance in computing performance and capabilities over any other previous generation," said Mooly Eden, vice president and general manager, PC Client Group, Intel. "The built-in visual capabilities enabled by these new processors are stunning. This combined with improved adaptive performance will revolutionize the PC experience in a way that is obvious for every user to see and appreciate â visibly smarter performance."
New features include Intel Insider, Intel Quick Sync Video, and a new version of the company's award-winning Intel Wireless Display (WiDi), which now adds 1080p HD and content protection for those wishing to beam premium HD content from their laptop screen to their TV. The company also revealed arrangements with CinemaNow, Dixons Retail plc, Hungama Digital Media Entertainment, Image Entertainment, Sonic Solutions, and Warner Bros. Digital Distribution.
In December, a rumor claimed that Apple would release new MacBooks in 2011 that will rely on Intel's Sandy Bridge processor family, which could mean that Nvidia graphics solutions will not be included in at least some models 13 inches and under. It has been suggested that MacBook models with screen sizes 13 inches and under will have Intel Sandy Bridge-only graphics, while Apple's larger, higher-end MacBooks with screen sizes of 15 and 17 inches will allegedly rely on GPUs from AMD.
Starting in 2010 with its Arrandale processors, Intel began building in the major northbridge chipset memory controller components to its chips. The architectural changes in Arrandale, along with a lawsuit, forced Nvidia to halt the development of future chipsets.
69 Comments
I think Intel changed their plans and officially released them early, 2 days ago. I can even buy them in the shops as of today (the 2300, 2400 and 2600 only).
These chips are surely destined for the MBP very soon.
I would love to replace my desk work machine, a 3 year old 17" Mac Book Pro 2.5 GHz C2D, (pre-unibody) with a new 27" iMac running one of these new i7s and SSD.
Now that there are very capable small portable machines available, I could use a much faster, and a much larger-screened, workstation on my desk which can be stationary, attractive, and cleaner than having a big PC, or cleaner than a Laptop + Monitor combo that takes up more room and never needs to move.
I would love to replace my desk work machine, a 3 year old 17" Mac Book Pro 2.5 GHz C2D, (pre-unibody) with a new 27" iMac running one of these new i7s and SSD.
Now that there are very capable small portable machines available, I could use a much faster, and a much larger-screened, workstation on my desk which can be stationary, attractive, and cleaner than having a big PC, and cleaner than a Laptop + Monitor combo that takes up more room and never needs to move.
thats what i used to think. let's see, my 17" mbp with 4gig ram and 2.66 c2d cost over 4 thousand. divide by 3 and get my cost per year. uggh.
and my 24" imac. cost 3 thousand all said. runs like sh*t with 10.5.6 compared to my dell with ubuntu.
os x is the new windows. bloated and a pain. even itunes and safari updates are requiring a reboot now. stupid.
thats what i used to think. let's see, my 17" mbp with 4gig ram and 2.66 c2d cost over 4 thousand. divide by 3 and get my cost per year. uggh.
and my 24" imac. cost 3 thousand all said. runs like sh*t with 10.5.6 compared to my dell with ubuntu.
os x is the new windows. bloated and a pain. even itunes and safari updates are requiring a reboot now. stupid.
I agree with your OS evaluation, I am only commenting on the nice hardware. I actually run Bootcamp Windows on my Mac hardware because I need Windows to support work software. The Mac hardware is the nicest option now that SSD is available. I built a PC last year because I needed SSD and fast i7, and it was much faster than the iMac at the time, but unreliable, and bulky compared to the new iMac that now finally has faster i7 and SSD.
thats what i used to think. let's see, my 17" mbp with 4gig ram and 2.66 c2d cost over 4 thousand. divide by 3 and get my cost per year. uggh.
and my 24" imac. cost 3 thousand all said. runs like sh*t with 10.5.6 compared to my dell with ubuntu.
os x is the new windows. bloated and a pain. even itunes and safari updates are requiring a reboot now. stupid.
Not sure where you're buying from, but you're getting ripped off, even if those figures were in pounds they're expensive. I'm running an i7 27" iMac with 8 Gigs of ram for a grand less than the figure you've quoted above, and my 24" was less than 1700 similarly 'top spec' at the time. These figures in pounds, including VAT. And a 17" macbook pro has never cost that much - 4000 - are you crazy?!
OSX runs incredible quickly and is very stable - check your machine for issues.
Safari uses webkit, which is at the core of the operating system, Safari updates have always required a restart. I suspect you don't understand as much about computing as your rant would have us believe. My 24" iMacs are running snow leopard, and are performing incredibly well - best check your system and see what you've done to mess it up.