Peter Kafka of All Things Digital reported Thursday that Apple is "actively seeking licenses" for a new cloud-based music locker service and is willing to pay labels for the privilege.
According to Kafka's sources, Apple has inked deals with two of the for major labels, which include Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group, Sony and EMI within the last two months. One source claimed Apple VP Eddy Cue will be in New York on Friday in an attempt to solidify remaining deals.
"Theyâve been very aggressive and thoughtful about it,â Kafka reported an industry executive as saying. âIt feels like they want to go pretty soon.â
Kafka's sources have yet to see the service for themselves, but say they're aware of the "broad strokes." "The idea is that Apple will let users store songs theyâve purchased from its iTunes store, as well as others songs stored on their hard drives, and listen to them on multiple devices," Kafka wrote in his report.
The report comes on the heels of a Reuters report earlier Thursday that claimed Apple had "completed work" on a cloud-based iTunes music streaming service. Citing anonymous sources, the report said Apple is "set to launch" the service, which would store users' songs on a remote server and allow them to access them from "wherever they have an Internet connection."
However, the Reuters report claimed that Apple had yet to arrive at new licensing agreements with the labels.
Rival Amazon launched a digital music locker last month without new licensing approval. The online retailer has reportedly faced a backlash from the music industry as a result.
According to Kafka, Apple would be able to create a more "robust service" than Amazon with re-negotiated licenses. That service could include "better user interfaces, sound quality, and other features," said Kafka.
For example, Kafka has heard that Apple's new deals with the labels would allow the company to "store a single master copy of a song on its servers and share it with multiple users."
Apple's upcoming music streaming service could come in the form of an enhanced version of MobileMe. In February, The Wall Street Journal reported that Apple plans to revamp its MobileMe offerings by adding a free 'locker' service for storing photos, music and videos.
In 2009, Apple bought streaming music service Lala for $85 million, prompting speculation that iTunes streaming was in the works. However, Apple shuttered Lala last year and the rumored service has yet to materialize.
Google is also planning a similar service, but has reportedly gotten bogged down in negotiations. According to Reuters, the company has repeatedly changed its mind during talks with labels, bringing talks to a standstill.
"They keep changing what they're asking for," said a label executive. Sources claim Google had originally planned an 'iTunes-like store,' but had been begun exploring licensing for a subscription service in recent weeks.
32 Comments
Whats the point if Amazon and Google are just going to do it anyways without the labels permission?
Sounds like Apple is entering into agreements which are only going to handicap them in the long run.
According to Kafka's sources, Apple has inked deals with two of the for major labels...
That tell me the other two will be following suit.
I hope we have a special event on this within a couple weeks. Maybe with a new version of Xcode and an iOS 5.0 demo. I see no reason why Apple can?t release iOS 5.0 before the 5th generation iPhone. The stepped method is working out for the iPad releases and it could help boost sales for different quarters with a HW/SW tick/tock method.
But if iOS 5.0 doesn?t come until the G5 iPhone I?d think they?d launch this service sooner. Will it be a point update to iOS 4.x or just web access until they release iOS 5.0?
I hope so. Amazon?s service looks like it put together in a weekend by some college kids for a class project. Or Google.
I can?t imagine it any other way. There is no reason for the exact same file to be stored for every user that has that file. That?s some old school, basic iDisk storage, not the modern Dropbox and Time Machine storage technology.
"They keep changing what they're asking for," said a label executive. Sources claim Google had originally planned an 'iTunes-like store,' but had been begun exploring licensing for a subscription service in recent weeks.
I wish Google would get some focus and try to make one thing great before moving trying to complicate it.
Whats the point if Amazon and Google are just going to do it anyways without the labels permission?
Sounds like Apple is entering into agreements which are only going to handicap them in the long run.
The labels could sue and/or threaten to withdrawal their content. To me this seems like one thing Apple would want to get the labels to agree with.
How does Apple make money from a locker service?
I can understand a pay-monthly service that allows you to listen to anything you want...
How does Apple make money from a locker service?
I can understand a pay-monthly service that allows you to listen to anything you want...
Maybe it?s only for MobileMe suscribers.
Maybe it?s a way to keep users tied to the iTunes ecosystem and associated devices.
PS: When did the ?locker? or "digital locker" term get coined. Since Amazon?s service arrived it?s become very popular. I like it, but I can?t find an etymology on it coinage.
Whats the point if Amazon and Google are just going to do it anyways without the labels permission?
Sounds like Apple is entering into agreements which are only going to handicap them in the long run.
Well, the points are:
1. Do the right thing and purchase rights from the owners of the songs (and hopefully some of the money flows back to the artists)
2. Avoid being caught up in years of litigation
3. Don't anger the labels that feed iTunes
4. Make the iEcosystem even more superior to the competition
5. Don't risk losing a lawsuit that could cost hundreds of millions, or more, in damages
Amazon and google will/are taking a tremendous risk here....