According to Bloomberg, Judge Thomas Pender said that the patent design case may boil down to the "Cheech and Chong" test, which identifies an object using the following no-nonsense qualifications: âDoes it look like it, feel like it, smell like it?â
For those unfamiliar with the 1970's routine, found here (warning: coarse language), Cheech forces Chong to feel, smell and taste a substance they believe to be dog feces before finally deciding that it was, indeed, excrement and that they were glad not to have stepped in it.
The humorous quip doesn't lessen the gravity of Apple's allegations, which assert that Samsung's Galaxy Tab and smartphone lineups copied the look and feel of the original iPad and iPhone. The Cupertino-based company first leveled accusations of patent infringement in an April 2011 suit that has ballooned into a worldwide dispute spanning multiple continents.
U.S. Administrative Law Judge Thomas Pender. | Source: USITC
The statement was part of the case's opening arguments which saw Apple reiterate its long-held stance that Samsung flagrantly copied the design of the iPad and iPhone.
âNot content to copy the overall design and interface, Samsung has copied the smallest detail of the iPhone,â said Apple lawyer Harold McElhinny of Morrison & Foerster. âSamsung copied our original and iconic design.â
Samsung claims that it arrived at the designs after spending decades and $3.5 billion on research.
âSamsung has been in this industry, building and innovating to the point where Apple could enter the market,â said Samsung lawyer Charles Verhoeven of Quinn Emanuel. âWe are anything but an also-ran trying to copy Appleâs technology.â
Verhoeven goes on to say that Samsung is "also known for its designs" and the company has been "recognized worldwide and compared favorablyâ to Apple.
Judge Pender will hear the Apple v. Samsung case through June 6 and is expected to deliver a ruling on Oct. 5.
The South Korean company has an ITC patent case of its own against Apple that is scheduled to be held from June 4 through June 15. Judge James Gildea, who previously handed down an unfavorable ruling against Apple in an HTC complaint that was later overturned, will be overseeing the case. A determination is expected to be reached by Sept. 14.
Apple recently filed for a U.S. injunction against Samsung's Galaxy Tab after it won an appeal against opposing findings from a California court.
92 Comments
Good thing it wasn't the 'Cheech, Chong, and Chewbacca' test.
This quote cracks me up:
Samsung claims that it arrived at the designs after spending decades and $3.5 billion on research.
Good thing it wasn't the 'Cheech, Chong, and Chewbacca' test.
This quote cracks me up:
Samsung claims that it arrived at the designs after spending decades and $3.5 billion on research.
Similarly, this quote is quite humorous.
"Decades. Literally DECADES, your honor."
...
"Decades. Literally DECADES, your honor."
"Samsung has been in this industry, building and innovating to the point where Apple could enter the market"
Uh, wha...? No really, what? It's great that they do memory, screens, CPUs, and really without the overall advances in the components it's unlikely that Jobs would have been able to get a device in the form factor he wanted with the functionality that he wanted, but that's industry wide advancements - and in what way does that mean they didn't totally copy Apple in design and interface/usability? They used the iOS knockoff and then copied the hardware as well.
Apple isn't suing other screen makers or chip makers, they're suing Samsung for ripping off their phone and tablet designs. And to think people say Apple has a reality distortion field.
And to think people say Apple has a reality distortion field.
They copied that, too.