Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Google slapped with antitrust lawsuit over app store management

Last updated

An assembly of attorneys general representing 36 states and the District of Columbia filed an antitrust lawsuit against Google on Wednesday, claiming the company's handling of the Play Store violates U.S. law.

Filed in California federal court, the suit is led by Utah, North Carolina, Tennessee, New York, Arizona, Colorado, Iowa and Nebraska, reports Politico. It is the latest in a string of antitrust challenges against the search giant, which saw three similar actions in 2020.

In October, the U.S. Department of Justice filed a suit targeting Google's outsized power in mobile search. December saw 15 states and territories file suit against Google's advertising business, while a second action backed by 38 states and territories again took issue with the firm's search engine.

Today's antitrust suit deals with Google's Play Store fee sharing structure, which currently demands developers pay a 30% commission on sales of digital goods and services. The company recently adopted a fee schedule that drops the rate down to 15% for the first $1 million app makers earn in a year.

Google's reduced commissions came after the company said it will more strictly enforce a policy that requires developers to use its billing system for purchases made through the Play Store. The announcement sparked intense pushback from the likes of Netflix, Spotify and Match Group, which have avoided Google's commissions. That change is set to go into effect in September.

For its part, Google in a Senate hearing in April said its fee structure is in line with industry standards. Further, revenue from Play Store commissions goes toward developer tools and Android updates. Apple has made identical claims in the past as part of its many legal battles over App Store management.

Unlike users of Apple's iOS, however, Android device owners have the option of purchasing apps from other app stores or sideloading software directly from the web.

Keep up with everything Apple in the weekly AppleInsider Podcast — and get a fast news update from AppleInsider Daily. Just say, "Hey, Siri," to your HomePod mini and ask for these podcasts, and our latest HomeKit Insider episode too.

If you want an ad-free main AppleInsider Podcast experience, you can support the AppleInsider podcast by subscribing for $5 per month through Apple's Podcasts app, or via Patreon if you prefer any other podcast player.



20 Comments

gatorguy 14 Years · 24643 comments

Weird lawsuit. On Android there's the option of side-loading and using alternative app stores like Amazon's. On iOS there is no such option, it is 100% Apple's to control, but the AG's are accusing Google of antitrust violations despite not having control of the app delivery market for the OS??

KTR 5 Years · 280 comments

Financial legal extortion IMO 

2 Likes · 0 Dislikes
Wgkrueger 9 Years · 352 comments

Pretty soon our tech companies will be running like the US government. Back to 32 bit code and floppy disks IMO. 

2 Likes · 0 Dislikes
mcdave 20 Years · 1927 comments

No! You mean the store fees aren’t just for financial transactions? They pay for the ‘free’ OS and ‘free’ developer tools & deployment?

Interesting they have triggered the same “we want your store but we don’t want to pay for it” when other stores & direct distribution are available. Almost as if the idea of using something and not paying for it is unreasonable.

4 Likes · 0 Dislikes
foregoneconclusion 13 Years · 2862 comments

gatorguy said:
Weird lawsuit. On Android there's the option of side-loading and using alternative app stores like Amazon's. On iOS there is no such option, it is 100% Apple's to control, but the AG's are accusing Google of antitrust violations despite not having control of the app delivery market for the OS??

Here's a link to the complaint that was filed...
 
https://ag.ny.gov/sites/default/files/utah_v_google.1.complaint_redacted.pdf

Part of what is being alleged is that Google advertised Android as being "open" while using a host of strategies to ensure that it wasn't really "open". There are a lot of details about Google's alleged tactics to undermine side loading and alternate app stores in the PDF. According to the filing, Google controls over 90% of the market and no alternate app store has more than 5%. But in a nutshell, that's a big part of the lawsuit: what Google claimed to the public/market/developers versus what they were actually doing. This lawsuit is specific to licensable operating systems. Since iOS is proprietary, it's not included in this particular action. 

One thing that is similar to Epic's lawsuit against Apple is the idea that requiring developers to use Google's 1st party billing for in-app purchases is an "illegal tie". 

4 Likes · 0 Dislikes