Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Tim Cook says Apple's DEI program may change in the future, but only if required by law

Apple CEO Tim Cook said the company's DEI program might see changes in the future.

During a shareholders' meeting on Tuesday, Apple CEO Tim Cook explained that the company might have to alter its DEI program policies as the US legal landscape shifts.

On February 25, Apple held its annual shareholder meeting for 2025. Though multiple issues and proposals were discussed, a DEI-related proposal from shareholders belonging to a conservative think-tank, the so-called "National Center for Public Policy Research," garnered the most attention.

They claimed that Apple's current DEI program might pose "litigation, reputational, and financial risks" to the company. Apple understandably fought back and urged shareholders to vote against the proposal.

Owners of Apple shares overwhelmingly voted to maintain the iPhone maker's current diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) program along with its associated policies and hiring practices.

Mere minutes after the decision was made, however, Apple CEO Tim Cook commented on the future of the iPhone maker's DEI programs. As was reported by The BBC, Cook said that Apple's DEI program could change in the future, should there be a need to comply with changes in laws and regulations.

"As the legal landscape around this issue evolves, we may need to make some changes to comply, but our north star of dignity and respect for everyone and our work to that end will never waver," said the CEO, adding that the company would continue to work on "a culture of belonging where everyone can do their best work."

During the shareholders' meeting, Cook also pointed out that Apple's strength comes precisely from its diversity, and that there were no DEI-related hiring quotas. The CEO explained that the company's culture was one where "people with diverse backgrounds and perspectives come together," and said that the iPhone maker would remain "committed to the values that have always made us who we are."

Cook's most recent statements come as no surprise, given his previous comments on related issues. The NCPPR filed a separate proposition in 2014, when the right-wing group asked Apple to justify its environmental and accessibility practices, saying that they might negatively affect return on investment or ROI.

"When I think about making our products accessible for the people that can't see or to help a kid with autism," Cook responded, adding "I don't think about a bloody ROI."

Apple's stance on its diversity, equity, and inclusion policies has remained strong and consistent over the years. While some tech companies rushed to gain the favor of President Trump, Apple likely wouldn't follow suit unless compelled to do so.

Apple likely won't change its DEI policies unless forced

Though Cook outright said that Apple "may need to make some changes to comply," this doesn't mean that a policy change will arrive in the immediate future. If such changes were to happen, they would only be implemented to ensure compliance with law.

Two men in suits sit at a table; one looks amused, the other is speaking into a microphone. President Trump could theoretically force Apple and other companies into changing DEI programs.

The comments made by Apple's CEO could be seen as little more than a public statement, meant to appease those who want changes to the company's DEI program.

Many US companies, including the likes of Meta, Amazon, and Goldman Sachs, have all rolled back or outright ended their DEI programs, and they did so to gain the favor of the Trump administration. President Trump has called for the end of DEI programs in both the government and private sector, so it makes sense that some companies would opt for immediate changes.

Tim Cook, however, already has an established strategy for dealing with President Trump, and it appears as though he's been trying to appease his close ally Elon Musk, who is in charge of the so-called "Department of Government Efficiency." Though the two are obviously against DEI policies, there is currently no law that would force Apple to abandon its DEI program.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in SFFA V. Harvard that discriminating based on race in college admissions violates the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. There's a belief that the ruling could impact corporate DEI programs, though no companies have yet been legally compelled to make changes.

Apple's own shareholders overwhelmingly voted to maintain the current DEI program, indicating that there is no significant desire for change on that front. The company itself previously urged shareholders to vote against proposed DEI changes, meaning that the company leadership has no intention of removing or scaling back the existing Inclusion and Diversity program, either.

While Apple's DEI program could see changes in the future, particularly during the next four years under the Trump administration, there are no indications that this will happen anytime soon. At the time of writing, there are currently no laws which would require private companies to eliminate their DEI programs.

21 Comments

netrox 13 Years · 1539 comments

What I don't get it is that DEI has nothing to do with Human Resources's hiring. It's about learning different viewpoints of different people from different cultures, embracing their diversity, and adding value to their services/products that will benefit minorities. 
 

5 Likes · 4 Dislikes
kdrummer 4 Years · 4 comments

As a former Apple employee, I can say I’m proud of the diversity practices that the company followed in the HW engineering organization and I presume there would be similar practices elsewhere. I think people are afraid that DEI means quotas, but that’s not at all what it means. At Apple, it meant putting in the extra effort to make sure qualified candidates from all backgrounds were encouraged to apply. One way they did this was to re-write job descriptions in a way that wouldn’t discourage applicants from underrepresented groups. Seems subtle, but there’s some research supporting this. 

On a higher level, they’d look at which groups weren’t being represented in the applicant pool and try to figure out why that was. If it was because that group was underrepresented in STEM fields, they would support causes that encouraged those to get into STEM. That could be in the form of scholarships, sending employees to do outreach at various conferences, and many more. 

Glad to see they’re staying the course. 

9 Likes · 3 Dislikes
Toortog 3 Years · 71 comments

Remember when Apple was the company with all the "Think Different" posters,  Apple proud of it cult status going it's way,   not Tim Cook is kissing the rump's rump.   It's not like Apple is a small company that could easily be crushed by Washington, Apple is big with plenty of cash to weather any political storm for what it knows right.   

2 Likes · 3 Dislikes
mattinoz 10 Years · 2568 comments

But at the risk of sounding heartless it seems pretty clear DEI measures have had an amazing return on investment. Brought in highly talented people in the business who might not have been exposed by regular hiring practices. Thinking about accessibility has clearly resulted in features that are great for everyone given every time new features are released there are articles about how they are hidden.

Why not think of the “bloody ROI” and just say these initiatives have opened Apple’s eyes to investments with solid returns. 

5 Likes · 3 Dislikes
sconosciuto 5 Years · 353 comments

Gotta hand it to conservative “thought” leaders, always coming up with new euphemisms for “ni@@er” for the benefit of their Y’all Qaeda base.

6 Likes · 5 Dislikes