Katie MarsalGreenpeace has already celebrated Apple's new push towards eco-friendly goods as beating much of the industry at its own game. The Mac maker, however, wasn't completely off the hook.
Complements were especially warm for the consumer electronics firm's turnaround on removing the most hazardous elements from its devices. Brominated Fire Retardants and PVC plastic. Greenpeace was acutely aware of Dell's 2009 target for doing the same and was pleased to hear that the Round Rock, Texas-based PC maker would be eclipsed by its arch-rival a full year sooner, scrubbing the devices clean by 2008.
"Way to go Steve," Greenpeace said on the matter.
The activist group also felt that its targeted campaign for greener Apple hardware had been validated by the change. Efforts by supporters to spotlight the computer builder's shortcomings in dramatic fashion — which included a complaint-ridden MacExpo protest and a near-literal greening of Apple stores — had made it "clear" that the wasteful practices needed to change, Greenpeace claimed.
Apple's CEO had mentioned the environmentalists' demands in his letter, but said nothing of the related protests. The company's shareholders had until today been scheduled to vote later his month on an investor-driven green timetable which would have brought the issue to the forefront with or without the demonstrations..
Even with its seeming victory, however, Greenpeace quickly turned its commendation into a jab at Apple's remaining weaknesses. The Mac maker's computer take-back program was singled out as overly US-centric, according to the statement. While it meant that no discarded systems or handhelds from American would filter back to Asia and contribute to local pollution, buyers in other regions would be forced to toss their systems away. Other companies have already implemented worldwide recycling programs.
The environmental advocates also made it evident that the plan had to translate into action, and that the expectations for Apple — a company known for meticulous design — would be especially high.
"Apple hasn't gotten an actual green product to market, but no other electronics manufacture has either," Greenpeace commented. "That's a race worthy of the wizards of Cupertino."
-m.jpg)
Charles Martin
Malcolm Owen
William Gallagher
Christine McKee
Wesley Hilliard
65 Comments
I'm all for greening Apple and nuking Greenpeace.
Greenpeace seems to have totally missed one major point, Apple didn't do any of these things in reaction to their request. The efforts described in Jobs' letter have been underway for the last 10-15 years at Apple. All Greenpeace has done to Apple is help persuade them to make their existing programs known to the public; they have not effected any change within the company.
Greenpeace should do more research before making public claims that aren't true. It would be respectful and more effective if they contacted an Apple representative to inquire about their environmental programs, in an effort to work with Apple to make their "green" labors known, rather than slinging mud then claiming their efforts were successful.
"Apple hasn't gotten an actual green product to market, but no other electronics manufacture has either," Greenpeace commented. "That's a race worthy of the wizards of Cupertino."
See, what do they mean by "green product" ... one that contains no hazardous chemicals? That's going to be impossible for any electronics manufacturer ... it would be nice if Greenpeace actually defined what they wanted...
Only too predictable... "Even with its seeming victory, however, Greenpeace quickly turned its commendation into a jab at Apple's remaining weaknesses."
Friggin' tools.
I'm all for greening Apple and nuking Greenpeace.
Agreed.
They claim vicotry but all the nerds know that LED is better for the user and just happens to be greener than what we have now. So no victory, just good PR for Apple to get GP off their case just a little. But the little buggers are like roaches and just keep coming with it.