Wireless carrier AT&T is looking to use next month's launch of iPhone as an important branding opportunity, but now appears unlikely to offer subsidies on the Apple handset, according to comments made during a recent AT&T investor gathering.
First off, said Hodulik, AT&T indicated that it plans to use the iPhone launch "as a branding event" and that it will also increase its advertising dollars around the product to cement the "AT&T Mobility" name in the market. The No. 1 U.S. wireless carrier added that it expects Apple to market the product aggressively through its own avenues, as well.
"We expect the wireless market to see increased competitive pressure with the
launch of the iPhone," wrote Hodulik. "Meanwhile, the company will increase advertising and handset subsidies on non-Apple phones to take back postpaid gross add share lost in [the first quarter].
At the same time, however, the UBS analyst said comments made by AT&T management led him to believe the carrier will not subsidize the cost of Apple handsets, as has been widely rumored over past few months.
"In fact, AT&T may generate a small margin on sales of the [iPhone] in its stores," he wrote.
Hodulik add that, "Management would make no comments [sic] on how the phone is activated in its own or Apple owned stores, suggesting that this may be done somewhat differently versus typical handset purchases."
Overall, the analyst said he walked away from the meeting believing that AT&T's revenue share with Apple could be a more meaningful portion of monthly average revenue per user than previously thought. He explained that this is possible given the "significantly better economics" AT&T should realize from iPhone subscribers, given the lower "churn" and cost of adding each user to its network with advertising and branding help from Apple.
"The main concern was the impact of a generous revenue share could have if a large number of iPhone subscribers were existing AT&T Mobility customers," wrote Hodulik. "While giving no details, management suggested this had been contemplated, leading us to believe that the revenue share changes based on whether the customer is a new or upgraded subscriber or that the economics are adjusted based on the actual numbers of each."
Lastly, the UBS analyst said, AT&T expects the Apple phone to help drive traffic into its stores where it will increasingly sell wireline products along side its wireless services.
116 Comments
if they are not going to subsidize it, then the least they can do is to give free internet connectivity.
If not free then at least subsidize the data plan for 1 or 2 years. Full price for the iPhone and for the cell service doesn't seem like a winning combination.
Is this not the very same news that we've been hearing from day one? What is not to understand about this?
Apple said no subsidies early on. I don't see why this is so hard for people to understand...
-Clive
These wireless carriers are so addicted to the "free phone" drug it is only a matter of time before we see subsidies. We know there are over a million intrested buyers and I could see a few hundred thousand pay full pop to be an early adopter... then, with the other 800,000 are sitting around scratching themselves wondering if they really want to spend the money, AT&T will remember the good ol' days when they sold 200,000 phones in 10 days and they will offer some type of deal to get more people in.
As the old saying goes, there are only two factors in business... fear and greed. AT&T will be greedy soon enough to take some risks.
Especially at launch, there is no reason for anyone to subsidize the iPhone, I believe that demand will outstrip supply even at the unsubsidized price until after Christmas. Remember that three years ago, plenty of people were buying the RAZR at $500. I see the price of the iPhone coming down eventually just like the RAZR did, but certainly not until they can keep up with the significant demand that they will have. I believe that the iPhone will be THE hot Christmas present this year, and the June launch gives Apple just the right amount of time to ramp up production to meet the demand.