When Apple finally opens its iPhone and iPod touch to third-party developers early next year, it will employ some extra measures to maintain the security and stability of the mobile platforms, such as requiring a digital signature on each authorized application.
"That way if thereâs something wrong with an application, you have a way to track it back to where it came from," Joswiak said. "So one of the things we want to do, again, is create a development environment that is going to maintain the security and reliability of the iPhone yet at the same time offer developers some really cool things that we can do."
Accomplishing both those tasks simultaneously is a challenge in that they run in opposition to each other, the Apple vice president admits, and that's why it will take until February before his company finally unveils all the details of the software development kit (SDK) for iPhone (and iPod touch).
"Of course what we want to make sure weâve done is keep the phone safe and reliable, and thatâs why itâs taken us a little while to get this SDK out," he said. "Especially now that weâll have a real SDK which means legitimate developers are going to come into the space."
In addition to those "legitimate developers," Joswiak also expects the SDK to mark the arrival of smaller, grassroots coders, which he finds exciting.
"Sometimes these one- or two-person teams have created the most dramatic things," he said.
In his interview with Fortune, Joswiak also admits that it was his idea to push for Apple to produce a 14-inch iBook several years ago, despite reservations on the matter by Jobs. The notebook, which featured a larger screen than the remainder of iBook line, went on to be a runaway hit.
That revelation alone may offer some reasoning behind the company's reported decision to adopted a 13-inch display as the foundation for its upcoming sub-notebook rather than something smaller.
58 Comments
What kind of steps (and cost) are typically involved in creating a digitally-signed product? Do you use the same security certificate you would use on your web site?
I have high hopes for this SDK. Hoping Apple let developers dig deep into the iPhod and not just crawl around on the surface. It'd be great with a safe baby-SDK for easy development, but in order to do these "really cool things" or these "dramatic things" I think the developers must be offered as much access as possible to the hardware. It seems this Greg wants this too if I catch the spirit right. Cool.
Oh yeah.. and let's pray these digital ID's don't cost a lot of money for the developers. That'd just cause more hacking spirit wouldn't it?
In addition to multitouch, if devs can also access the tilt sensor (with full accuracy, not just 90-degree) and the vibrate action (gamepad-style force feedback) then the iPhone would be a pretty unique game machine.
No comments from Apple on Android, huh?
What kind of steps (and cost) are typically involved in creating a digitally-signed product? Do you use the same security certificate you would use on your web site?
It doesn't look to be much in the way of cost. We don't know yet if apple will charge for a service here, or whether it will be automatic.
Nokia charges each developer a tiny $20 fee, as Jobs stated that Nokia was on the right track, it could mean that Apple will likely charge a small fee, or, possibly, nothing at all.
Since Joswiak was so excited about those one and two developer teams, Apple can't be charging an arm and a leg.
This does sound very good. But, we still have at least two months to go.
Hopefully, something will be explained, and unveiled, at Macworld 6 weeks from now. I guarantee, that time will come up very quickly.