Citing is own sources, as well as a leaked presentation slide belonging to Intel, the Inquirer is corroborating reports first published by AppleInsider last year in saying that the touch-screen handset is destine to join the ultra-mobile platform in the not too distant future.
However, and more appropriately given recent disclosures by the Intel on the first-generation of the Atom architecture, the evidence suggests the transition will not take place until the second rev of the ultra-mobile Atom platform, code-named Moorestown.
This would see the third-generation iPhone pick up Silverthorne's smaller, and more refined successor sometime in 2009, while the Silverthorne chip itself serves an initial role in Apple's tablet-like extension of the iPod touch platform, frequently referenced by AppleInsider as a reincarnation of the Newton MessagePad.
Among other things, the move will allow Apple to better solidify the codebase of its handheld devices with that of its remaining business segments, mainly its Mac computer line and fledging media hub business (Apple TV). It will also serve as a measure that will help the electronics maker form a tighter shield around its intellectual property, given that the company's disclosures and product plans will be privy to one less partner.
During Intel's Fall developer forum last year, executives for the chipmaker flaunted an unnamed Moorestown processor, describing it as the "chip the iPhone would have wanted." Like Silverthorne, the 45nm Moorestown design bundles an integrated memory controller, video encode/decode engine and graphics processor all on a single SoC, with the added option of WiFi, 3G, and WiMAX technologies.
An Intel Atom roadmap slide shown off at CeBIT | Source: The Inquirer
40 Comments
Because we know someone giving a presentation, and needing some picture to indicate smart phones, would never pull out a picture of an iPhone unless it was guaranteed to be under Intel's wing soon enough.
This isn't evidence of anything... it's just the graphic Intel chose to represent "Smart Phones". It's like saying that computer desk you buy from Sears will include an iMac because it's got a cardboard cutout of an iMac on it. Or those computer ads where the companies show a Mac but Photoshop a Windows desktop onto it.
I'm sure Apple is considering Intel's products carefully-- they've got some great products in the pipeline. But this isn't evidence, anecdotal or otherwise.
If it's freshly-coined as Atom, why reference Silverthorne? Makes for a confusing read.
If it's freshly-coined as Atom, why reference Silverthorne? Makes for a confusing read.
Atom isn't just Silverthorne you know.
/Adrian
(1) It's the Inquirer
(2) It's just an image they used for Smartphone, it's not making any statements
Moorestown would still have to be a quarter of the size, 4x more integrated and use 1/4 of the power to compete with the ARMs that will be out at that time. Never mind that Apple is quite happy right now to use ARM, and it's clearly powerful enough for the current iPhone's software.