Just as the most prominent attempt at cloning Macs is falling apart, another is preparing to take its place and promises a better experience, even as it knows it will likely face a battle with Apple's legal team.
Besides having a physical space to sample and buy its computers, though, Quo tells CNET that it plans to offer better-than-average hardware. It also wants to offer customer service "up there with Apple's," according to the young clone firm's founder, Rashantha De Silva. In fact, rather than try to differentiate itself from Apple, the California startup is priding itself on how closely it will copy Apple's practices as a whole — with the exception of allowing more configurations.
"We are trying to mimic things as much as we can," De Silva says. "I'm hoping that Apple sees the value in what we are doing."
As optimistic as the company head may be about duplicating Apple's strategy, he and Quo aren't under illusions that they're completely immune from attack. De Silva expects that Apple "probably will" file a lawsuit but is counting on the quality of its systems doing better justice to Apple and, somehow, avoiding a legal penalty. He sees the clones increasing Apple's influence and ultimately its market share.
It's less than likely that Apple will share the same attitude. Psystar was sued just three months after it began offering its OpenMac (later OpenComputer) and was challenged not on the quality of its systems but on allegedly violating the Mac OS X End User License Agreement (EULA), which explicitly forbids installing and using the operating system on any computer without an Apple badge. The Mac maker rejected Psystar's beliefs that it, too, offered extra value and had the cloner's antitrust claims dismissed; Apple argued that, as it was competing against a larger PC market, it alone could dictate how and where its software would run.
But while Florida-based Psystar is facing bankruptcy as a combination of business and legal concerns drag it down, its West coast counterpart is already preparing to expand beyond its first three clones, with both an Apple TV-style hub and a small form factor parallel to the Mac mini possible in the future.
200 Comments
First company wasn't doing so well, so it seems that all these Psystar backers have moved on to another company to go after Apple.
Sounds like "Quo Computers" is another shady operation, maybe backed by the same people behind Psystar, testing Apple in court to sell Mac clones. It's likely no coincidence this new company shows up a week after Psystar bows out.
Something fishy is going on here...Are you listening, Steve?
First company wasn't doing so well, so it seems that all these Psystar backers have moved on to another company to go after Apple.
that's my first thought. I dont do conspiracy theories but this company opens up right after Psystar's bankruptcy. coincidence?
Well Apple is obviously playing a game of 'whack a mole' here.
Now Steve Jobs knows better, he got rid of the cloners before, so why didn't he keep OS X tied to hardware like he had it under PPC? A extra hardware chip for Intel Macs?
So what I'm thinking is this, he allows the cloners a free run for some time, bashes a few to make it look good and then with the next OS X release (Snow Leopard?) he clamps down the OS to EFI.
EFI has to "check in" occasionally with Apple servers to verify OS X before it loads. So begins another DRM/cracker war, making it difficult to use OS X for commercial hackintoshes. (or slow them up by having to provide so many cracked updates)
Far as I know the commodity PC boxes don't have EFI, right?
What if Apple blended the OS X DRM with commercial apps? So nothing would run unless everything was kosher?
Apple has to do something to stop the cloners, or is by allowing these guys to operate is this some sort of low end market share trojan horse?
If they're going to follow Apple so close with prices that aren't much different, then why risk going bankrupt?
I'd rather spend the $100 extra and buy an Apple knowing I'm getting the real deal and full support.