Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

iPhone 3GS recognizes FaceTime URLs in iOS 4

FaceTime supports iOS URL schemes, enabling users to initiate a call by clicking on a hyperlink. iPhone 3GS users can see and click the links but they don't work, not even for audio-only calls. Yet.

Reader Felipe Baez discovered facetime:// URL scheme support while examining how FaceTime works. iOS began supporting URL schemes a couple years ago; the feature enables webpage links or apps to launch other apps on the phone.

Introducing URL schemes

Apple supports a variety of URL schemes for launching bundled iOS apps from a URL (or programmatically within an app). For example, tel://8008675309 prompts the user to dial that number. It also works with alpha characters, so tel://888facetime correctly translates the letters into the corresponding numbers to dial.

Additionally, mailto://danieleran@mac.com would launch Mail app with that addressee, and sms:// (followed by a mobile number or short code) launches Messages with a text addressed and ready to enter.

Apple also opened the URL scheme concept up to third party developers so they can register their own URL scheme. While http://facebook.com/ always launches the web app version of Facebook using Safari, links beginning with fb:/ will launch the Facebook app instead (as long as it's installed).

Linking to FaceTime

It's therefore not surprising that Apple's FaceTime has its own URL scheme that allows other apps (or hyperlinks on a web page) to initiate a video chat. What is interesting, but not surprising, is that the URL scheme isn't enabled on anything other than iPhone 4.

Oddly however, on other iPhone models running iOS 4, FaceTime URLs are recognized as a valid URL scheme. So rather than not being clickable or resulting in an error message that the URL is "invalid" (as an unrecognized URL scheme does), iPhone 3GS users who click on a facetime:// URL get a strangely blank screen (below).

FaceTime URL scheme

This could be a simple mistake by Apple, or could be evidence that partial support for FaceTime calls was pulled late in the release. Earlier iPhones don't have the processing muscle to handle a video call, but they should be able to handle an audio-only call. Being able to place free, audio-only iChat conversations from any iPhone running iOS would certainly be an attractive feature to users, particularly international callers.

The lack of audio-only FaceTime on earlier phones running iOS 4 may be due to the fact that carriers wouldn't accept free WiFi phone calls (enabled by default on 60 million iPhones, and easy to use), while they would support video calling as an iPhone 4 feature, as the carriers either can't currently handle FaceTime calls (think AT&T) or have no real business around selling video calls anyway (everyone else). They do have a lucrative long distance voice business.



32 Comments

robin huber 22 Years · 4026 comments

Brings to mind the Grimm story: The Brave Little Tailor (who killed 7 in one blow). All these Android devices and all the king's men couldn't exceed the reach of just this one device. Go Apple. Go 'Pad.

Oh, and where are all those posters who thought the name "iPad" was a total disaster? Every time someone saw one they would only think of feminine hygiene? What happened to that idea that some were so passionate and positive about? That it just showed how stupid Apple was? Oftentimes, Steve knows best.

spudit 16 Years · 49 comments

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robin Huber

Brings to mind the Grimm story: The Brave Little Tailor (who killed 7 in one blow). All these Android devices and all the king's men couldn't exceed the reach of just this one device. Go Apple. Go 'Pad.

Oh, and where are all those posters who thought the name "iPad" was a total disaster? Every time someone saw one they would only think of feminine hygiene? What happened to that idea that some were so passionate and positive about? That it just showed how stupid Apple was? Oftentimes, Steve knows best.

Not sure where you are going with this comment...does it have anything to do with the article? Facetime looks cool, but until you have some serious market penetration, it's pretty useless. They should open up at least audio calls for 3G/3GS users...doesn't seem any different than using Skype, etc. Only then will Apple see widespread adoption.

womble2k2 15 Years · 118 comments

So the next minor revision might bring a new feature to 3GS users, Faceless Time

robin huber 22 Years · 4026 comments

Quote:
Originally Posted by spudit

Not sure where you are going with this comment...does it have anything to do with the article? Facetime looks cool, but until you have some serious market penetration, it's pretty useless. They should open up at least audio calls for 3G/3GS users...doesn't seem any different than using Skype, etc. Only then will Apple see widespread adoption.

Nothing at all to do with it. Posted on the wrong thread.