A new report this week The New York Times used Apple's iPhone 4 as an example of rising costs in the Chinese supply chain for global consumer electronic devices. It spoke of impending increases in manufacturing costs in China, noting that "soaring labor costs caused by worker shortages and unrest, a strengthening Chinese currency that makes exports more expensive, and inflation and rising housing costs" could significantly increase production costs for the Cupertino, Calif., electronics company.
Although estimated labor costs comprise just 7 percent of the overall final cost of the iPhone 4, analysts note that many of the companies in Apple's supply chain also rely on efficient, low-margin Chinese factories to keep their costs low. The report also said that Apple's high margin products should be able to absorb the increased costs with minimal disruption, while other brands may face a bigger challenge.
A large percentage of Chinese factories are located in the southern part of China, especially Shenzhen, which, as a Special Economic Zone, provides special government-endorsed incentives to manufacturers, with unique laws that are more relaxed than in the rest of China. Despite these incentives, Foxconn Technology, a division of the Taiwanese-based Hon Hai Group, recently announced its intention to move "hundreds of thousands of workers to other parts of China" in response to rising costs. Moving its operations inland would reportedly save Foxconn 20 to 30 percent in labor costs.
The report said that wages in China have increased by more than 50 percent since 2005. Salaries are expected to increase another 20 to 30 percent this year, as workers continue to feel they are being underpaid, and those employees have the support of local governments.
Foxconn has 800,000 supply chain workers in China alone, with contracts to supply major electronics companies including Apple, Dell and HP. Foxconn is the biggest name in the $250 billion industry, which the report noted is "invisible to consumers."
The report draws heavily from a teardown report of iPhone 4 from market research firm iSuppli. The El Segundo, Calif., firm placed the total bill of materials for the new smartphone at $187.51, but does not include labor and manufacturing costs. According to the Times, the combination of sharply rising wages, continued appreciation of the Chinese currency, and unsustainable labor practices are threatening both the margins of contract manufacturers and major brands and the stability of China's manufacturing boom.
In June, it was reported that Apple was giving back some of its profits to workers who assemble its products. Foxconn had already promised a 20 percent raise in the wake of investigations into several highly publicized suicides that took place at the manufacturing giant's Shenzhen plant. In response, Apple conducted an independent investigation into the working conditions at the plant, which employs over 400,000 workers.
31 Comments
Ah, the inevitable and relentless march of globalization. Gotta love it.
India, Vietnam, he we come!
Workers in the third world should not suffer so that westerners can have a device to send tweets and play games for a low price. While we shouldn't expect exactly the same conditons as we are used to for these workers, it's reasonsable that they shouldn't have to work 70-80 hours per week and still not have enough money (or time) to change their station in life.
So in my opinion, let the labor costs rise and if that means the phone will cost (after subsidy) $219 instead of $199, so be it.
We've become completely spoiled by the absurdly low prices of most consumer electronics and as a result, we've become even more of a "throw-away" society. And one of the costs of that insistence that everything be priced so low ($49 DVD players anyone?), is that we've exported millions of factory jobs (which isn't all bad news - it's not terrible that people in the third world are gaining employment and in at least some cases, creating a middle class, if they don't feel like committing suicide first).
And yet, there are items that are priced (IMO) absurdly high: like $40 cases for an iPad. For $40 for a small piece of sewn cloth or $25 for an iPhone case made with about 20 cents worth of plastic (the packaging probably costs more than the product itself), you'd think they could be manufactured in the U.S. (or other high labor cost country).
Workers in the third world should not suffer so that westerners can have a device to send tweets and play games for a low price. While we shouldn't expect exactly the same conditons as we are used to for these workers, it's reasonsable that they shouldn't have to work 70-80 hours per week and still not have enough money (or time) to change their station in life.
So in my opinion, let the labor costs rise and if that means the phone will cost (after subsidy) $219 instead of $199, so be it.
We've become completely spoiled by the absurdly low prices of most consumer electronics and as a result, we've become even more of a "throw-away" society. And one of the costs of that insistence that everything be priced so low ($49 DVD players anyone?), is that we've exported millions of factory jobs (which isn't all bad news - it's not terrible that people in the third world are gaining employment and in at least some cases, creating a middle class, if they don't feel like committing suicide first).
And yet, there are items that are priced (IMO) absurdly high: like $40 cases for an iPad. For $40 for a small piece of sewn cloth or $25 for an iPhone case made with about 20 cents worth of plastic (the packaging probably costs more than the product itself), you'd think they could be manufactured in the U.S. (or other high labor cost country).
Rather than looking on the negative side of things all the time. The western desire for gadgets and other goods has accelerated development of many poor countries.
And when it becomes economically viable, india and vietnam (as someone just said) will be next on the list to benefit.
It's not all violin playing misery.
To allow labour costs to artificially rise, denies someone else, in another country, with even less money, a chance to benefit from globalisation.
Workers in the third world should not suffer so that westerners can have a device to send tweets and play games for a low price. While we shouldn't expect exactly the same conditons as we are used to for these workers, it's reasonsable that they shouldn't have to work 70-80 hours per week and still not have enough money (or time) to change their station in life.
So in my opinion, let the labor costs rise and if that means the phone will cost (after subsidy) $219 instead of $199, so be it.
Kudos to you!
Ahhh, blame the Little Emperors.