Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Company, not Cook, will be held responsible if Apple loses fight over FBI case, experts say

Although CEO Tim Cook could, theoretically, be put in prison if Apple continues to refuse the order to help the FBI unlock an iPhone belonging to San Bernardino shooter Syed Rizwan Farook, more likely is that the company itself might be held in contempt, according to a pair of experts weighing in on the matter.

A privacy lawyer with the Electornic Frontier Foundation, Lee Tien, told Quartz that the company could potentially be hit with severe fines. Specifically he referred to a 2007 case, in which the U.S. government allegedly threatened Yahoo with fines up to $250,000 per day if it refused to share data wanted for surveillance.

Both Yahoo and Apple were among several major U.S. tech companies later identified as participants — willing or unwilling — in PRISM, a National Security Agency program scooping up vast amounts of Internet communications data. That program was exposed in 2013 by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden.

A national security law expert at American University, Stephen Vladeck, also supported the view that Apple as a whole could be held in contempt.

Cook has said that he's willing to resist the order as far as a Supreme Court challenge, though a lawyer for the company — Ted Olson — said on Friday that Apple will probably back down if it loses at that level. No penalties are likely to come into force unless Apple makes a stand past that point, and therefore breaks the law.



66 Comments

ceek74 12 Years · 324 comments

sog35 said:
For all those who support the FBI answer this question:

Would you allow the USA government to put a tracking device on the wrist of every single person on USA soil?

The device would have to be worn 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. The device would be locked on your wrist and almost impossible to take off by a regular citizen. If you take it off you can be sent to jail. It would track everywhere you go, everyone you speak to, and even record conversations. But such a device would decrease crime and probably would have stopped this recent terrorist attack in California. We should do everything to stop terrorism right?  Even if it means giving up some liberty and privacy?

Isn't that right FBI supporters?

We're almost there.

curt12 9 Years · 41 comments

Back when Yahoo was in the hot seat, the govt threatened exponentially increasing fines. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2014/09/15/you-think-youve-got-bills-government-could-have-fined-yahoo-trillions-of-dollars/

rob53 13 Years · 3313 comments

I'm still trying to understand what legal request Apple isn't complying with. They've provided the FBI with everything they can find. What's left?

if you say hacking the phone I doubt there's any legal precedence requiring them to do so. 

blastdoor 15 Years · 3594 comments

$250k/day doesn't seem too bad -- it's less than $100 million per year, which really isn't enough to register on Apple's earrings report. 

Seems like that's worth doing. 

roake 10 Years · 820 comments

A third-grader could have come to the conclusion mentioned in the headline.