Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Largest torrent site's owner arrested, Apple data crucial to investigators

An iTunes account and the associated Apple email address were keys to the investigation leading to a takedown of the head of the world's largest torrent aggregator.

Ukranian national Artem Vaulin was arrested and charged in Poland on Tuesday for his involvement in the "KickassTorrents" (KAT) site. The arrest concluded several years of investigation, and encompasses two counts of criminal copyright infringement, conspiracy to commit criminal copyright infringement, and a money laundering charge stemming from his purchase of legal content from the an iTunes media store.

The sequence of events from start to finish span several cooperative efforts between advertising agencies, Apple, Facebook, and financial institutions. Latvian banking information was gleaned from an advertisement placed on the site by law enforcement, which allowed investigators to glean a valid email address for Vaulin, and direct connections to several KAT fansites and Facebook groups associated with the site.

Using basic "WhoIs" and website ownership services, law enforcement discovered two name server IP addresses that KAT used for several years. The name servers were reportedly tracked back to Vaulin in march 2016, after law enforcement was given access to the Chicago-based server logs. For the first time in the eight-year investigation, an actual name for the site owner was known.

Also discovered by US Homeland Security through the name server data was an associated email Apple email for Vaulin. The Apple email was used by the same IP address to purchase iTunes content, as well as manage one of the KAT Facebook properties.

The same email address also was used for the KAT Bitcoin wallet, and was associated with a $72,000 transfer to a Coinbase account belonging to Vaulin.

The US is seeking forfeiture of the seven domains associated with KAT, and extradition of Vaulin for trial. Attorney General Leslie R. Caldwell said that Vaulin "stole more than $1 billion in profits from the U.S. entertainment industry" in his role as the head of the site.

Despite the attorney general's claims about lost profits, which always come under fire from critics, Vaulin allegedly reaped $31 million in deposits from advertising on the site between August 2015 and March 2016. KAT ran for eight years, and the Department of Justice claims that it receives more than 50 million unique visitors per month and is the 69th most frequently visited website on the internet.

KickassTorrents never actually hosted the infringing content. The site was a torrent file tracker, providing a search engine to discover files that allowed a BitTorrent client to identify who had a wanted movie, album, or book available. Notices were posted on the site claiming that they respond to Digital Millennium Copyright Act content removal requests, but how often such requests were fielded is unknown.

The site's content and indices were delisted in 2013 from Google, at the behest of the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA). Mirrors of KAT databases pop up from time to time, and are indexed for a time until Google identifies the source of the originating data.

BitTorrent itself is not illegal, but frequently comes under fire for enabling the easy and rapid distribution of pirated digital content. The underlying technology is frequently used to distribute game patches, such as Blizzard's World of Warcraft, and a similar implementation was used to deliver the Windows 10 update and subsequent patches to users.



16 Comments

TurboPGT 9 Years · 355 comments

When are content providers going to wake up and start competing with piracy? There is literally no other way to beat it. For every site they take down and person they arrest, 10 more spring up in its place. It is always going to exist. You just have to incentivize the legal options. 

1) Theaters are dead, and are not making as much money as digital distribution could. New releases that are $10-15 per ticket in the theatre? They need to be available on streaming services the same day, to rent, for a premium. Instead of spending upwards of $20-40 for a couple or family to go to a movie, make the new release $29-49 to rent. With strict limitations during the launch period. 

2) iTunes needs a new model. Apple Video, or whatever they'd call it. $19.99 a month to stream the entire catalog of movies and tv shows. No ownership. Purely streaming, as well as downloads with DRM.

maestro64 19 Years · 5029 comments

oh this is going to hurt, I can hear the asses pukering in the torrent world.

They caught this guy the same way the caught that guy who ran the silkroad on the darknet. These techies think they are smarter than everyone and will not get caught.

MacPro 18 Years · 19845 comments

Yes it certainly has a tainted reputation as a distribution system for me at least.  Window 10 and its auto updated using Torrent technology amazed me when i saw it as an option in the set up.  I instinctively declined that option (along with every other option in Custom set up too I might add).

MacPro 18 Years · 19845 comments

TurboPGT said:
When are content providers going to wake up and start competing with piracy? There is literally no other way to beat it. For every site they take down and person they arrest, 10 more spring up in its place. It is always going to exist. You just have to incentivize the legal options. 

1) Theaters are dead, and are not making as much money as digital distribution could. New releases that are $10-15 per ticket in the theatre? They need to be available on streaming services the same day, to rent, for a premium. Instead of spending upwards of $20-40 for a couple or family to go to a movie, make the new release $29-49 to rent. With strict limitations during the launch period. 

2) iTunes needs a new model. Apple Video, or whatever they'd call it. $19.99 a month to stream the entire catalog of movies and tv shows. No ownership. Purely streaming, as well as downloads with DRM.

Not talking about movies here as you are, but for apps, my two cents here is Apple's amazingly low prices for purchasing its software and family usage/sharing plans with free updates is probably the only solution to battling software piracy.  Renting at high costs like Adobe not so much.

As to movies, IMHO there are so few good ones these days and TV content has improved so much thanks to technology it's not just prices here.  In fact, ironically,  my wife and I found CinéBistro a wonderful experience (no under 21 helps!) where the movie cost far more than normal not to mention the drinks and fillet mignons.  That said, for the most part Netflix and TV shows suffice for us with a few beers and a bowl of popcorn at home.  For the few really good movies each year, it's CinéBistro and damn the cost from now on!

gatorguy 13 Years · 24627 comments

TurboPGT said:
When are content providers going to wake up and start competing with piracy? There is literally no other way to beat it. For every site they take down and person they arrest, 10 more spring up in its place. It is always going to exist. You just have to incentivize the legal options. 

1) Theaters are dead, and are not making as much money as digital distribution could. New releases that are $10-15 per ticket in the theatre? They need to be available on streaming services the same day, to rent, for a premium. Instead of spending upwards of $20-40 for a couple or family to go to a movie, make the new release $29-49 to rent. With strict limitations during the launch period. 

2) iTunes needs a new model. Apple Video, or whatever they'd call it. $19.99 a month to stream the entire catalog of movies and tv shows. No ownership. Purely streaming, as well as downloads with DRM.
Not talking about movies here as you are, but for apps, my two cents here is Apple's amazingly low prices for purchasing its software and family usage/sharing plans with free updates is probably the only solution to battling software piracy.  Renting at high costs like Adobe not so much.

As to movies, IMHO there are so few good ones these days and TV content has improved so much thanks to technology it's not just prices here.  In fact, ironically,  my wife and I found CinéBistro a wonderful experience (no under 21 helps!) where the movie cost far more than normal not to mention the drinks and fillet mignons.  That said, for the most part Netflix and TV shows suffice for us with a few beers and a bowl of popcorn at home.  For the few really good movies each year, it's CinéBistro and damn the cost from now on!

Heard someone talking about them just a couple of days back, and like you they spoke highly of the experience. I wish there was one closer to us, but we'll eventually make it to one fairly soon despite the travel, perhaps even the same as you visit.