Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

In filing for $3 billion IPO, Snapchat identifies Apple as a major competitor

Snap Inc, the company behind the Snapchat iOS app, is preparing an initial public offering which it hopes can raise $3 billion, with the Securities and Exchange Commission filing identifying Apple and its iMessage platform as one of its main competitors.

Announced on Thursday, the SEC filing reveals the "camera company" wants to use the trading symbol "SNAP" on the New York Stock Exchange. Snapchat has approximately 158 million daily users, according to the filing, with over 2.5 billion "Snaps" created every day by its users, with the average user opening the app 18 times a day and using it for between 25 and 30 minutes per day.

By the end of last year, Snap had a reported revenue of $404.5 million, a 689-percent year-on-year increase, but the net loss for the period of $514.6 million is also greater than the loss the previous year of $372.9 million. Even so, the high $3 billion target for the IPO is said by Theh Wall Street Journal to give Snap a valuation of at least $20 billion, and possibly as high as $25 billion.

The company has been accused of inflating its user numbers to boost its IPO, as part of a lawsuit filed by Anthony Pompliano in January that alleges wrongful termination. The complaint has since been denied by Snap, with a spokesperson describing it as being "totally made up by a disgruntled former employee."

In the filing, Apple is mentioned by name a total of six times, with five referring to ways Apple is a risk to the company. It is noted Apple and Google have extensive control over the iOS and Android operating systems and the major app stores, meaning each can "provide customers with products that compete with" Snapchat, including potentially giving preferential treatment to competitors that "could seriously harm Snapchat usage on mobile devices."

There is an acknowledgement Snapchat is "heavily influenced" by the technology offered by operating systems like iOS, and could suffer from extreme changes to the way it operates. "We may be able to create new products based on advances in their capabilities, but we may also be limited if they choose to block a particular feature or reject new updates in our application."

Snap admits the majority of its user engagement is through iPhones, and has prioritized development of its products on iOS over Android. To continue its user engagement growth, Snap suggests a shift in priorities to put Android development first, with added concern of harm to the business if "fewer people use smartphones with iOS" and if the company doesn't improve its Android products sufficiently.

In terms of "significant competition," Apple is on the list of "larger, more established companies," alongside Facebook's Instagram and WhatsApp, Google, Twitter, Line, Naver, Tencent, and Kakao. Apple, Facebook, and Google are singled out again, with Snap warning the three "could use strong or dominant positions in one or more markets to gain competitive advantages against us in areas where we operate."

Instagram is highlighted as an example of the intense competition, with the filing noting the Facebook subsidiary's introduction of a feature "that largely mimics our Stories" included in Snapchat itself.

The sixth and final mention of Apple in the filing appears in the list of Executive Officers. Steven Horowitz, Vice President of Engineering since January 2015, has previously worked for Google, Microsoft, and Apple, and is also a member of the board of directors at Quotient Technology.



18 Comments

SpamSandwich 19 Years · 32917 comments

I've never gotten the appeal of Snapchat... or Facebook for that matter. What one must give up in exchange for such "free services" has never struck me as reasonable.

boxcatcher 9 Years · 275 comments

sog35 said:
Apple should buy them

That would be a great use of $25-$30bn (Snapchat's full valuation) ... /s

maestro64 19 Years · 5029 comments

This is going to turn into another twitter from a stock market point of view. Everyone is going to love them and then eventual the market will ask the hard to answer but simple to ask question of how you make money and how do you grow the business. You would think with Trump raging battle on Twitter and all the people joining to watch the carnage their stock would be going through the roof it is not they have no path forward. SnapTrap (did they on purpose) tried the do the name change ahead of time so not to be associated with picturing take, but it not going to solve their fundamental problem, which is where do that go from there. Yeah they made the next generation of glasshole glasses that was innovative. Facebook is trying to turn themselves into a different company and trying to figure out how to make more money on what that know about its users.

If you buy in do not hold if it make a run jump out and watch for the crash back to earth.

randominternetperson 8 Years · 3101 comments

sog35 said:
Apple should buy them
That would be a great use of $25-$30bn (Snapchat's full valuation) ... /s

Agreed.  First off users of these services are very fickle.  Millions of users could migrate to some new startup at the drop of a hat.  My late-teen kids communicate with their friends in real-time all day long using an evolving constellation of systems from Skype to SnapChat to iMessage to SMS to in-game messaging to who-knows-what.  If tomorrow they add Slack to the mix for example it wouldn't surprise me in the least.  Interestingly they don't use Facebook or (except VERY rarely) email.

Apple just needs to make sure iMessage (or whatever they call it now) and FaceTime continue to evolve as top-tier options.

linkman 11 Years · 1041 comments

The overvaluing of companies like these is astounding. Two years straight with huge losses (and probably all five years the company has existed) and they want a huge amount of high risk investment? Yet Wall Street will buy it up and the first round IPO buyers will make a good deal of money and leave the rest for the losers.