Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Apple secures lower streaming rate in new deal with Warner Music Group, report says

Last updated

Apple has reached a new agreement with Warner Music Group that will see the tech giant pay out a smaller percentage of Apple Music revenue than it did when the service launched in 2015.

Citing sources familiar with the matter, Bloomberg reports Apple's renewed arrangement with Warner Music Group comes as technology companies and major record labels spar over licensing fees. With existing contracts soon to expire, Apple is looking to pay Warner, and perhaps other record labels, a smaller percentage of Apple Music sales as the service grows out its customer base.

With a boom in on-demand music, music rights holders are amenable to receiving lower rates so long as services like Apple Music continue to sign up subscribers, the report said. Currently, Apple pays labels 58 percent of sales, a rate the company is looking to drop to 55 percent this year. That figure could see further reductions if subscriber uptake continues at a rapid pace, the report said.

Apple's new deal was in part helped along by market competitor Spotify. The segment leader earlier this year secured a rate reduction from Warner Music Group, down from 55 percent to about 52 percent, dependent on subscriber performance. Warner also struck a long-term deal with YouTube, presumably involving streaming rate cuts.

Alongside the Warner deal, Apple is also on the cusp of inking a similar arrangement with Sony Music Entertainment, the report said.

Buoyed by a surging streaming market, Apple and other service providers have earned leverage in negotiations with major labels like Warner and Sony. Still, Universal Music Group, owner of the world's top label, is still reluctant to cede ground on the issue, and a rate reduction deal with Apple is unlikely to surface anytime soon.



11 Comments

anantksundaram 18 Years · 20391 comments

Big deal. I guess musicians can starve a bit more than they normally do. Streaming is too expensive, as we all know.... 

(That's meant to be sarcastic. And no, I am not a musician). 

JinTech 9 Years · 1061 comments

Big deal. I guess musicians can starve a bit more than they normally do. Streaming is too expensive, as we all know.... 

(That's meant to be sarcastic. And no, I am not a musician). 

Unless completely independent, bands normally make pennies from record sales, or in this case downloads and streaming and instead make most of their money from concert tickets and merchandise. Sad reality.

gmgravytrain 8 Years · 884 comments

I think as long as Apple can prove that their iOS user base will continue to climb, TimeWarner should be convinced they'll get their money's worth. Apple needs to market AppleMusic more than they currently do. Considering Apple has 1B active iOS users, 20 to 30 million AppleMusic subscribers doesn't seem like a very large number. That's about 3% tops of Apple's entire iOS user base. I would have thought Apple could get closer to 50 million AppleMusic subscribers at this point but that was just my rough guess.

ksec 18 Years · 1502 comments

I think as long as Apple can prove that their iOS user base will continue to climb, TimeWarner should be convinced they'll get their money's worth. Apple needs to market AppleMusic more than they currently do. Considering Apple has 1B active iOS users, 20 to 30 million AppleMusic subscribers doesn't seem like a very large number. That's about 3% tops of Apple's entire iOS user base. I would have thought Apple could get closer to 50 million AppleMusic subscribers at this point but that was just my rough guess.

1. Because their competitor is actually rather good at it.

2. Apple Music, after all the iteration, is still very poor in overall quality. And being let down by its iTunes software on Windows.

I am honestly surprise Apple has 20 -30 million members, may be most of them are in US, where the music collection are better, and more Apple Fans are buying into it.  

bitmod 11 Years · 267 comments

I think as long as Apple can prove that their iOS user base will continue to climb, TimeWarner should be convinced they'll get their money's worth. Apple needs to market AppleMusic more than they currently do. Considering Apple has 1B active iOS users, 20 to 30 million AppleMusic subscribers doesn't seem like a very large number. That's about 3% tops of Apple's entire iOS user base. I would have thought Apple could get closer to 50 million AppleMusic subscribers at this point but that was just my rough guess.

Have you tried Spotify? 
Vastly superior in every conceivable way. 

Apple needs to implement HiFi audio streaming. (MQA)
Make Airplay easier to license for HiFi companies.
Remove the DRM from Airplay.
Fire everyone they have doing curation and start over. 
Completely re-work the GUI of Apple Music so it's even somewhat logical. 
Support more HiFi companies.
Add better DAC's to their gear.

They do this and they won't be perceived as a streaming service catering to top-40 teenie boppers - listening to garbage on garbage earbuds. 
Curated by lousy algorithms perpetuated by mainstream DJ's recommending more the same mainstream. 

Streaming is about the excitement of discovering new music and having it sound great and work flawlessly. Spotify gets this. 
Apple see's streaming as just another computerized revenue stream to enhance their ecosystem.