If Apple hadn't introduced iPhone X at a special event on Tuesday, iPhone 8 and 8 Plus would have been its premium priced, stand-out smartphone models for 2017. But even with the new X shamelessly showing off, the relatively less exciting pair of 8s actually offer a compelling upgrade for buyers who want and need less than the absolute best, most expensive option in smartphones.
What am I, chopped liver?
Steve Jobs made "one more thing" into an anticipated meme at Apple Events, but iPhone X took the unusual path of being "the one more thing" that threw the just-previously-detailed iPhone 8 under a metaphorical bus. On Twitter, there were jokes that iPhone 8 suffered the most rapid fall into obsolescence ever.
However, outside of technical enthusiasts who are ready to spend $999 or more on the latest and fanciest mobile computer phone, there is actually a major market for iPhone 8 and iPhone 8 Plus. In fact, the majority of new iPhone buyers will almost certainly spring for the significantly less expensive new 8 models, even if they do lack True Depth and the Super version of Retina HD offered by iPhone X.
Journalists looking to report on "the new" spent more time playing with iPhone X, but as outlined and demonstrated in the hands on area, iPhone 8 is a solid product that looks great.It delivers as large of a generational leap (if not more so) than last year's iPhone 7 did, without demanding the additional $300 premium of iPhone X.
Consider that the majority of the market gets by with a basic Android priced below $300, puts up with white box generic Windows PCs, and, statically speaking, eats whatever goat meat can be obtained rather than the finest Kobe beef chateaubriand available for consumption. Price is definitely a factor in decision making.
The most expensive iPhone ever, for a few minutes
That said, Apple's iPhone 8 lineup is — outside of iPhone X itself — the most expensive iPhone it has ever offered, starting at $699 rather than the typical $650 for a base new iPhone generation. Clearly Apple didn't care about the memos advising it that low-priced hardware is how one achieves the booby prize of "market share." Remember how much "market share" Nokia, Palm, Motorola and BlackBerry once had?
Apple isn't opposed to selling affordable products; it just reduced the entry price of its least expensive iPhone SE to $349. That model is a perfectly serviceable device with a very good camera, fast performance and a high-quality build. However, the price premium of iPhone X over iPhone 8 is just $50 shy the price of a new iPhone SE!
Clearly, while some need a low price, others are willing to pay far more. And in between the two extremes there's a mass market willing to pay a bit more, but certainly less than the maximum. That's the zone of iPhone 8 and iPhone 8 Plus.
Automakers have long been known to market high-end show off models designed primarily to cast a halo over their more basic offerings. iPhone X appears to be an effort to define the best smartphone one can buy. Underneath it, Apple now has a second tier of fanciness. In fact, in a world without iPhone X, iPhone 8 would have been the "best" models alongside two earlier generations that Apple will apparently continue to sell: iPhone 7 and iPhone 6s, beyond the smaller and least expensive iPhone SE.
Distinctive styling
iPhone X has definitely generated intense interest, but it appears iPhone 8 will continue to make up the majority of Apple's sales. It's as significantly differentiated from the last, best iPhone 7 by its wicked fast A11 Bionic processor; in stand out features (including iPhone X style enhanced Portrait lighting effects and wireless charging); and in its appearance.
In particular, the new iPhone 8 features distinctive styling springing from its new polished stainless steel case design, set apart with its glossy frosted glass back, available in three colors.
The Gold option, arguably the nicest color option, is exclusive to the iPhone 8 line this year. And if you prefer a new iPhone with a white face, you can only get that on iPhone 8, as both the silver and space grey iPhone X have black faces (in part to help hide the True Depth sensor.
Familiar, enhanced
Even while it's not the most advanced iPhone that can be bought this year, iPhone 8 is still appealing and fresh. And even at its premium price, it's certainly easier to afford.
Additionally, users who are concerned about how well Face ID can work, or who like the idea of physical Home button or the familiarity of the existing iOS gestures can convince themselves that they're not just saving money but actually prefer the iPhone 8 lineup.
iPhone 8 delivers rear camera features effectively on par with iPhone X, thanks in part to having the same A11 Bionic brain and its built in camera logic supporting new 1080p Slo-mo at 240 fps and 4K video recording at the fast, smooth new 60fps capture mode. It even features the same front facing camera, although it lacks iPhone X's 3D sensors supporting Face ID and app effects including Animoji.
iPhone 8 (like iPhone X) also adopts Bluetooth 5 (versus 4.2 on earlier iPhones), and extends support for new alternative satellite positioning systems: Europe's Galileo Japan's QZSS, in addition to the American GPS and Russian GLONASS supported on previous iPhones. It's basically iPhone X without the ultra-premium frosting and a commensurate price tag.
Apple's iPhone 8 and 8 Plus handsets are offered in three colors — silver, space gray, and a new shade of gold — and go on sale Friday, Sept. 15, with shipments slated to arrive on Sept. 22. Prices for the base level 64GB iPhone 8 and 8 Plus are pegged at $699 and $799, respectively, while step-up 256GB models run $849 and $949.
34 Comments
" the price premium of iPhone X over iPhone 8 is just $50 shy the price of a new iPhone SE"
This is slightly disingenuous. The correct comparison (both price-wise and feature-wise) is not the iPhone 8 but the iPhone 8 plus. The 8+ and the X have a MUCH more similar screen size and camera functionality. The price comparison between these two is "only" $150. Seems to me if you're already spending $850 on the iPhone 8+, springing for a X at $150 is a no-brainer.
The only reason NOT to do this is that you will probably have to wait until January (or maybe even March) to get an iPhone X. So if you can wait, seems worth it to me...
I do wish they had made a 128 GB version. 64 GB is a tad too small (especially when considering the 12 MP cameras), but 256 is overkill (at least for me)... 128 GB (which is what I have on my iPhone 6 is just right. Oh well...
I'm really thinking that Apple will not be able to meet demand at all on the iPhone X, and when I say that, I'm thinking through late spring. In my own case, I hadn't planned on purchasing one, but I am really interested in the X2, hoping that it gets Pencil support, a year from now.
It's conceivable that the pricing for the iPhone X isn't going to have much effect on demand; people will just adjust their initial outlays, or their payment plans, to get one. Demand is almost certainly going to exceed supply; would 50 million iPhone X's even be enough to meet demand for the next year?
With the price of the SE going down by $50 it's a great time to prefer a smaller phone. An SE sized iPhone X would be nice. The price would not.
The reason I'm only tempted by the 8/8Plus is because I really don't want to give up the home button and TouchID. With TouchID, if you choose to, you can select other fingers to activate it. You've only got one face for FaceID. Siri on the button one the side (the one that shuts off the phone) - seems like it's going to cause problems - short press, shut off. Longer press - Siri. Longer press - reboot. And as someone who activates his phone many times during the day - FaceID has to use more energy than TouchID. I LIKE having a bezel I can grab.
for buyers who want and need
knowing the difference between want and need = winning
Steve Jobs made "one more thing" into an anticipated meme
You know, they really should have used the stage elevator... https://youtu.be/EXClAFX8N2Q