Adding to the media frenzy surrounding possible iTunes movie rentals, a Hollywood magazine alleges that Apple's rentals will only last for short stretches of time and will use a flexible price structure.
However, Apple may rely on price and not longevity to lure in customers, according to the magazine. While some rentals will cost $5 each — placing their rental prices close to those of new releases at retail outlets — some will cost as little as $2.
No mention is made of the reasoning for the price system, though it may parallel Apple's variable price system for purchased movies, which discounts older titles.
The claimed sources also mirror information reported previously which suggests that Disney and Fox are the only two studios known to be pledging support for rentals. Other studios friendly to Apple's video efforts, such as Lionsgate, MGM, and Paramount, are described as candidates. Conversely, studios such as Sony, Universal, and Warner Bros. have "various competitive reasons" to keep their videos out of the service, Variety adds.
The latter may allude to Apple's spat with NBC-Universal, which has seen NBC TV shows pulled from iTunes. Universal Music Group has also opted out of long-term iTunes music contracts and excluded Apple from its protection-free music offerings.
Like all reports so far, however, the trade publication is certain about the date: its purported insiders state that Apple will announce movie rentals at next month's Macworld San Francisco expo.
86 Comments
Hmmm.... if variable pricing can work here, surely it should work with music too?
apple will not price rentals at more than $1.99 which is way to much i think. why?? because they have netflix and others compete with. $5 is the price of a new release DVD on ebay and amazon used in nearly perfect condition
Here in the UK you'd never pay $5 for a new rental, so I hope that if the service comes here Apple don't do their usual pricing strategy...
MGM is a Sony subsidiary, why the different policies?
/Adrian
I would absolutely go for $2 rentals. I don't care if it's one play and 24 hours to play it. I don't watch movies that frequently, so this would make much more sense for me than Netflix or anything like that.
If these are still SD, though, I will have difficulty justifying much more than $2 a movie. HD movies for $3-4 would be okay, but not for SD. I really hope Apple doesn't think they can still justify selling standard def movies for anything more than bargain basement prices in 2008.