Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Apple, Palm taking different steps to reduce worker overhead

While Apple is giving its phone rival Palm a drubbing in the market, both are now known to be scaling back their work commitments to employees — though Apple is using creative reassignments to soften the perceived blow.

People familiar with the matter say Apple plans to cope with the harsh economic climate by minimizing the need to lay off staff in favor of reducing hours and asking others to perform double duty.

The Cupertino-based firm is conscious that any retail layoffs would give a negative impression of its health and hurt its share value, and instead plans to scale back the hours worked by its part-time Mac Specialists that greet customers and promote products. This would keep them on the store floors while trimming employment costs, those aware of the changes say.

To compensate for the shortfall, Geniuses normally assigned to servicing products and answering questions will be asked to spend four of their weekly hours in the Mac Specialist role. Creatives manning the Studio sections of some stores will be asked to work as many as eight hours selling products.

How this pans out is still to be determined. Apple is running trials of this shuffled retail management to learn whether it should expand the reorganization on a broader level or consider alternatives that may include shelving the plans.

What's less than ambiguous, however, is a more drastic move by Palm. The beleaguered Treo maker has confirmed rumored restructuring to CNET and will take the much more direct approach of laying off employees in a bid to get its finances under control.

Company spokeswoman Lynn Fox isn't specific as to the lost head count or the reasons: she explains only that the job cuts are necessary to cope with Palm's "challenges" and that the firm needs to "focus [its] efforts more effectively."

While a struggling US economy plays into Palm's difficulties, the early smartphone pioneer no longer has the foundation of a successful business to cushion its fall. The company recently posted a $42 million loss and has been effectively ousted from its leadership role in the US workplace. Both Apple's iPhones and Research in Motion's BlackBerries have stolen Palm's market share in a market that was once considered a mainstay for the Treo line.

The Sunnyvale, California device maker also has to face a largely stalled product development process. Its Linux-based replacement for PalmOS 5, codenamed Nova, is overdue and now isn't set to ship with smartphones until the first half of 2009. Until then, the company is primarily relying on sales of its popular but low-profit Centro and its Windows Mobile-based Treos to sustain its business.

In a move that brings the company's difficulties full circle, Palm is also counting on former Apple senior engineering VP Jon Rubinstein to revive its fortunes by reorganizing Palm's staff and emphasizing better design.



30 Comments

valanchan 18 Years · 41 comments

When companies are able to hire again I wonder who good people would like to work for.

merdhead 17 Years · 587 comments

The question is, how far is Apple willing to go to protect its premium prices? If the recession goes on long enough (and it looks like it will) then sales will drop along with profits. I'm guessing that Apple would rather start laying off people than report a loss. Either way, people aren't likely to pay $1000+ for a laptop when they can get something workable for $500. If they don't have the money they don't have the money.

My guess is we will see layoffs ext year.

aplnub 20 Years · 2385 comments

Quote:
Originally Posted by merdhead

Either way, people aren't likely to pay $1000+ for a laptop when they can get something workable for $500. If they don't have the money they don't have the money.

I have never bought this argument. If that was the case, then explain the consistent increase in sales? Good times or bad, sales will go up and down but I think Apple will maintain prices. It is hard to drop prices on equipment and then explain that to your existing customer base. i.e. iPhone.

Layoffs may come but who knows, gun and ammo sales are so high right now that industry alone may pull us out of this economy.

aaarrrgggh 18 Years · 1607 comments

Quote:
Originally Posted by aplnub

I have never bought this argument. If that was the case, then explain the consistent increase in sales? Good times or bad, sales will go up and down but I think Apple will maintain prices. It is hard to drop prices on equipment and then explain that to your existing customer base. i.e. iPhone.

Just bought an Acer Aspire One. Not concerned about curtailing my spending, but the money I was willing to spend on a new computer was significantly lower than three months ago. I would have paid a $100 premium over the $450 (with taxes and shipping) for an Apple product (god I hate Windows!), but Apple doesn't have any offerings in this space. (I need a small, lightweight computer that is easy enough to take home and travel with relative to the 17" MBP.)

What that ultimately means is that I am less willing to spend money upgrading my wife's computer for a new MacBook, and I need a darn compelling reason to upgrade my 17". This doesn't bode well for Apple if there is a prolonged recession. This is not because I don't have the money to spend, but I see significantly lower value in what Apple is offering today.

I am a shareholder. I have lost more money on Apple than I made from my job this year, and three times what I made two years ago. It is important to me that Apple makes a good profit. At this point though, I want Apple to win mind share over making a great profit; profit doesn't really matter in increasing share value.

mactel 18 Years · 1275 comments

Quote:
Originally Posted by merdhead

The question is, how far is Apple willing to go to protect its premium prices? If the recession goes on long enough (and it looks like it will) then sales will drop along with profits. I'm guessing that Apple would rather start laying off people than report a loss. Either way, people aren't likely to pay $1000+ for a laptop when they can get something workable for $500. If they don't have the money they don't have the money.

My guess is we will see layoffs ext year.


We'll see if this rumor is true or not come their next quarterly filing.

This is indeed a recession but more exactly a world recession. Our banks and industries are so interwoven with foreign companies that it has become a domino effect with first the mortgage fiasco and then into construction, banking, and auto industry. If GM were to fail it would be felt world-wide.

Soon the luxury industries that include Apple will feel the affects and not in just the retail sector.

The only hope for our economy is a president that can imbue confidence in the American consumers. It is unbelievable that we have a sitting president that cannot stand up and do this. He has essentially already stepped down from power. He is the lamest duck president in all history of the U.S. I ashamed to be a registered republican.

Let's all hope Apple and the tech sectors hang in there along with the recovery of the rest of our economy with the new president coming into power.