Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Mystery device reference discovered again in iPhone OS 3.1

A file in the latest iPhone OS 3.1 beta refers once again to an unknown product with a new model number, fueling speculation that Apple has a new touchscreen device based on its mobile operating system coming soon.

The reference to a device called "iProd 0,1" was first discovered in March in the iPhone 3.0 OS beta firmware. The latest beta update also includes a reference to iProd, but this time the USBConfiguration.plist file gives the product the "1,1" distinction — something Apple typically uses to refer to its first-generation products.

The information, revealed to ArsTechnica by a developer, has led to speculation that a new, unannounced piece of hardware running the iPhone OS could be nearing launch.

The reference to iProd 1,1 has a product ID of 4762, while the original iProd 0,1 was model 4757. The new model also has references to Ethernet configurations, leading the report to suspect the supposed new device could have "gained high-speed networking capabilities" since the 0,1 hardware incarnation.

"What we are willing to bet on is that with a 1,1 moniker the product will see public release soon—perhaps as early as September, when Apple typically unveils new iPods," the report concludes.

When the original reference to iProd 0,1 was discovered, it was alongside a call to an iPhone 2,1 — a device that turned out to be the new iPhone 3GS. They were discovered alongside iPod 2,2, iPod 3,1, and iPhone 3,1.

Apple always uses the first number in these device identifiers to refer to major revisions, the naming schemes allude to a second major reworking of the iPhone in testing at Apple as well as a minor revision of the current iPod touch and a third-generation overhaul. The original iPhone is seen as iPhone 1,1, while the iPhone 3G appears as iPhone 1,2 — a minor upgrade to an existing design. The first- and second-generation iPod touch show as 1,1 and 2,1 respectively.



62 Comments

docno42 16 Years · 3761 comments

I knew I should have bought a Mac Pro instead of a Mac Book Pro \

mobius 18 Years · 378 comments

Quote:
The reference to a device called "iProd 0,1"...

iProd?! Are they really gonna call it that? That's too freakin' funny!

1984 19 Years · 946 comments

Quote:
Originally Posted by AppleInsider

When the original reference to iProd 0,1 was discovered, it was alongside a call to an iPhone 3,1 -- a device that turned out to be the new iPhone 3GS. They were discovered alongside iPod 2,2 and iPod 3,1.

I thought iPhone 2,1 was the 3GS...

0x1290 iPhone1,1 - iPhone
0x1291 iPod1,1 - iPod touch
0x1292 iPhone1,2 - iPhone (3G)
0x1293 iPod2,1 - iPod touch v2
0x1294 iPhone2,1 - iPhone (3G [s])

0x1295 iProd0,1 - ???
0x1296 iPod2,2 - iPod touch v3 ?
0x1297 iPhone3,1 - iPhone v4 ?
0x1298 iFPGA - ???
0x1299 iPod3,1 - iPod touch v4 ?

cmf2 16 Years · 1425 comments

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mobius

iProd?! Are they really gonna call it that? That's too freakin' funny!


Sadly I see that as a place holder for a name they don't want to include yet. It is most likely stands for iProduct.

floccus 19 Years · 138 comments

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mobius

iProd?! Are they really gonna call it that? That's too freakin' funny!


iProd

uct

Or did you think Apple is making a 3G capable cattle prod for all those rural ranchers who can't get coverage from ATT?