Italian businessman and private collector Marco Boglione made the winning bid, which came to about $210,000 after tax, by phone Tuesday at Christie's auction house in London, the Associated Press reports. Prior to the auction, Christie's estimated the computer would sell for between $160,000-240,000. When it was released in 1976, the Apple I sold for $666.66.
The Apple I computer, of which only 200 were made, has become a rare collector's item, as only 30 to 50 units are believed to still exist. The auctioned unit was listed as a "superb example" and came in its original box with a signed letter from Apple cofounder Steve Jobs.
Apple cofounder Steve Wozniak, who hand-built each of the Apple I personal computers, attended the auction, offering to add an autographed letter to the lot. Wozniak told reporters the auction was a historic moment for his work.
According to the AP, the auction included other pieces of technological history, such as an Enigma code-making machine and writings of Alan Turing, who is considered "one of the founders of modern computing."
"Today my heart went out as I got to see things auctioned off like the Turing documents and the Enigma machine â and the Apple I," said Wozniak after the auction. "It really was an important step, (even though) I didn't feel that way when I designed it."
Source: Christie's
39 Comments
If only didn’t change anything they would never have had the fragmentation that others say plague Apple’s products¡ Why did they choose to innovate; when will they learn?¡
If only didn?t change anything they would never have had the fragmentation that others say plague Apple?s products¡ Why did they choose to innovate; when will they learn?¡
They have learned, and excelled faster than any other computer company in history. The performance and reliability relies heavily on the proprietary format. This is what makes them great, and will continue to grow the company. Even larger companies are forced to curb to what Apple innovates, not the other way around. New ideas is what drives demand and branding. What exactly are you referring to??
Your opinion was valid about 6 years ago, but those days have long past, as market share continues to sway towards Apple, and their stock continues to skyrocket. My portfolio is certainly happy!
$666.66 was way too expensive. No wonder they only built 200 of 'em.
Didn't run PC software either.
Apple FAIL!
What exactly are you referring to??
That was sarcasm (as was my post).
I bet that beast had a whopping 2 kilobytes of memory