Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Apple seeks another $707 million in damages from Samsung

In addition to the $1.05 billion Apple was awarded by a jury for Samsung's patent infringement, Apple has asked the court for another $707 million in damages.

The request was revealed in a filing made late Friday by Apple and summarized by intellectual property expert Florian Mueller of FOSS Patents. With Apple's requested enhancements, supplemental damages and prejudgment interest, the company has asked the court for $1.756 billion from Samsung.

The additional $707,061,678 comes from an extra $135 million Apple seeks under the Patent Act, $400 million under the Lanham Act, $121 million in supplemental damages, and $50 million in prejudgment interest.

The filing means that a previous report out of Korea from last week, which claimed that Apple would seek an even larger sum from Samsung, was inaccurate. Mueller said that's because Apple recognizes only some parts of the $1.05 billion in damages it was awarded by a jury are subject to enhancement.

"Apple is smart enough to know that asking for the moon without a legal basis wouldn't do any good, neither in the court of law nor in the court of public opinion," Mueller wrote. "Apple is defending its intellectual property, and not just being greedy."

The iPhone maker has argued for the supplemental damages based on sales of Samsung devices between July 1 and the final resolution in court. The jury's damages were for the period through June 30, 2012.

Apple also believes that the payout should be increased because of Samsung's conduct, including sanctions that were given to the company for litigation-related conduct.



173 Comments

tallest skil 14 Years · 43086 comments

Wait, what happened to the $3 billion number from before?

muppetry 13 Years · 3319 comments

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tallest Skil 

Wait, what happened to the $3 billion number from before?

 

It indicates that the potential triple damages for willful infringement only applies to part of the $1.05B, not the whole sum.

strix 12 Years · 22 comments

Oh dear, made a bad career choice all those years ago. Should have applied to study law at Stanford rather than becoming an architect here in England!

tallest skil 14 Years · 43086 comments

Originally Posted by Strix 
Should have applied to study law at Stanford rather than becoming an architect

 

"…Strix is gettin' upset!"