AppleInsider Staff
A Tokyo court on Friday ruled a number of Samsung's legacy smartphone models infringe on Apple's so-called "rubber-banding" or "bounce-back" patent, a hotly-contested property in the companies' ongoing worldwide patent struggle.
The Japan court found older versions of Samsung's smartphone user interface, which have since been modified to avoid litigation, mimicked a unique scrolling behavior patented by Apple, reports Reuters.
Specifically, Samsung infringed on Apple's "rubber-banding" feature that triggers a "bounce-back" animation when a user scrolls to the end of a digital document. The property is designed to give feedback when navigating a web page other digital asset, adding to the carefully crafted user experience offered by iOS.
As noted previously, Samsung has changed the offending action in its latest products, adding a blue line to demarcate the end of a document.
The patent is still a bone of contention in the Apple v. Samsung post-trial proceedings, as the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in April found the property invalid. More recently, however, the USPTO validated a few key claims in the patent, including "Claim 19," which Apple successfully leveraged against a number of Samsung products in last year's high-profile jury trial.
Further details regarding the Tokyo court's decision will be announced when the final ruling is handed down later today.
-xl-(1)-xl-xl-m.jpg)
William Gallagher
Charles Martin
Marko Zivkovic
Amber Neely
Sponsored Content
36 Comments
Hi Samsung, How's your f*cking year going? :D Love, GTR
The problem with patent litigation is that everything takes too long. By the time a judgement is finally made the damage has been irreparably done and the pay out, no matter how large can not undo the lost sales/traction that your product had.
I hope Sacamsung don't bounce back from this.
[quote name="saarek" url="/t/158171/tokyo-court-finds-samsung-infringed-on-apples-rubber-banding-patent#post_2350286"]The problem with patent litigation is that everything takes too long. By the time a judgement is finally made the damage has been irreparably done and the pay out, no matter how large can not undo the lost sales/traction that your product had. [/quote] That is what what happened when Microsoft purloined the first Mac OS.
[quote name="saarek" url="/t/158171/tokyo-court-finds-samsung-infringed-on-apples-rubber-banding-patent#post_2350286"]The problem with patent litigation is that everything takes too long. By the time a judgement is finally made the damage has been irreparably done and the pay out, no matter how large can not undo the lost sales/traction that your product had. [/quote] Generally speaking I agree but I don't for a minute believe that Apple lost a single sale because Samsung phones had rubber banding.