News commentators covering U.S. elections for CNN were given Surface Pro tablets by Microsoft, but continued using iPads on air, covering up the supplied Surface with papers or even the iPad itself.
Even the good people at CNN who have Microsoft surface tablets in their face hide iPad ... - http://t.co/Sz6CpzLrEg pic.twitter.com/7Bam8uyI2G
— Melbourneer (@_Melbourneer_) November 5, 2014
Microsoft teamed up with CNN during the election coverage, advertising Bing and paying for placement of Microsoft hardware, including a "Magic Wall" and prominent placement of several Surface Pro hybrid laptops systems.
CNN panelists all have Microsoft Surface tablets. Just saw one of them pull out an iPad that had been in hiding. #productplacementfail
— Ryan Cooley (@ryancooley) November 5, 2014
While each panelist had a Surface propped up in front of them, multiple users were called out on Twitter for using an iPad anyway, including "using Microsoft Surface tablets as iPad stand."
CNN commentators using Microsoft @surface tablets as iPad stand. Facepalm. pic.twitter.com/BPxWTf2zhI
— Adam (@adamUCF) November 5, 2014
Just over one month ago, Microsoft similarly paid $400 million for Surface Pro product placement on NFL sidelines, funding the exchange of the playbook iPads many teams were using with the company's own hardware.
While Microsoft contractually banned iPads from appearing on camera, commentators referred to the devices as both "iPads" and "iPad-like devices."
Bose similarly paid for exclusive product placement in the NFL, seeking to ban any official appearance of Apple's Beats headphones, while inadvertently giving Beats free publicity as athletes including San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick continued to appear on camera in interviews while wearing Beats.
Samsung also attempted to ban any use of products bearing Apple logos among Olympic athletes after it paid big for product placement, and has repeatedly awarded celebrities with Samsung products, paid for cheaply phony viral videos, very elaborate promotions and prominent product placements that have frequently failed to work out well.
95 Comments
Yep, this story is slowly making the rounds. Talk about a backfire. “It’s good to be the King.” -Mel Brooks
I have no issue with people using Surface Pros because Microsoft paid for sponsorship. Perhaps the ruse could have been hidden better, but it's OK to love your iPad.
I didn't catch that since I don't watch CNN, but that's hilarious.
I particularly liked the bit about using the Surface as an iPad stand!
But, but, but, I thought that iPads were just toys!
Why wouldn't the commentators want to use the innovative and brand new, revolutionary input device called the mouse with the Surface? Or why wouldn't they want to use the almost twice as heavy Surface as a tablet? How baffling is that?
Who would ever choose the insanely powerful and insanely light iPad that has tons of great productivity apps available?
Careful with the axe Eugene... at least they have proven that the Surface CAN be used for something. For MS that is quite a leap, and I see a huge aftermarket kickstand business in their future.
I have no issue with people using Surface Pros because Microsoft paid for sponsorship.
I do.
There was this TV show that I was following some time ago called Under The Dome. After a while, the ridiculously obvious product placements of Microsoft devices popping up all over that show made it unwatchable and totally unrealistic. I think that they even have a new season of that show, but I don't really give a crap, because I'm done with it.