Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

California Assembly considers bill to mandate encryption backdoors

Last updated

A bill introduced in the California State Assembly earlier this year would require companies that build smartphones and mobile operating systems to build backdoors in their products and fine any company that does not comply.

Assembly Bill 1681 "would require a smartphone that is manufactured on or after January 1, 2017, and sold in California, to be capable of being decrypted and unlocked by its manufacturer or its operating system provider." Companies which "knowingly failed to comply" would be subjected to a $2,500 fine for each device sold in the state.

The bill was introduced in January by Assembly Member Jim Cooper and coauthored by Assembly Member James Gallagher and State Senators Patricia Bates and Isadore Hall.

As noted by the EFF, such a bill is problematic for a number of reasons. It would not prevent sales of encrypted phones in neighboring states, for instance, and would do nothing to stop the proliferation of encrypted communications tools.

Similar legislation has been proposed in New York by Assembly Members Matthew Titone and Walter T. Mosley, while U.S. Senators Diane Feinstein and Richard Burr are expected to introduce a comparable measure at the federal level soon.

"It's just that I have a basic fundamental belief this is very important and that no American company should be above the law," Feinstein said regarding her proposal.

The level of support for these measures in their various chambers remains unclear, and neither the California nor New York bill has yet made it out of committee. Meanwhile, Apple and the FBI continue to spar through the media and the bureau has appealed to New York courts for the reversal of a decision that went in Apple's favor.



72 Comments

🎅
wonkothesane 12 Years · 1738 comments

Hello, Mrs. Feinstein. I am sure, you are tech-savvy, and fully aware of all the consequences of your proposal.

Yes?

Are you?Please say that you are!....

lmagoo 9 Years · 49 comments

This easily proves that our politicians...ESPECIALLY in California....are dumber than a pile of bricks!! And good o'l Feinstein is at the head of the class !!!!!

🎅
razormaid 14 Years · 299 comments

There's a quick way to stop this bill... Apple should announce the iPhone will not be sold in California Apple stores and available ONLY by the Internet. The phones will be sold from Arizona only!  That should piss off enough people to start protests from the public. Have giant banners made and slap them on those pretty glass doors at each store nice and big:

STARTTING JAN 2017 IPHONES WILL NOT BE SOLD IN CALIFORNIA - CONTACT YOUR ASSEMBY PERSON NOW!

Common sense is loosing to stupid in this case. So hit California where they can truly appreciate it ... In their wallet!

❄️
peteo 15 Years · 402 comments

So they wont outlaw the sale, they will just fine companies to death. Really, lets take a run around the current laws and make its so we don't have to listen to them. Were not saying you can not build a phone that has no back doors, were just going to extort you to do this. Ridiculous. Its pretty obvious that the government will stop at nothing to get access to every thing about you to "protect" you from harm. Of course by doing this they harm our freedom but who really gives sh*t about that.

🎁
mr o 18 Years · 1045 comments

"It's just that I have a basic fundamental belief this is very important and that no American company should be above the law," Feinstein said regarding her proposal.

AND NO LAW SHOULD BE ABOVE BASIC UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS !

>:x