Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

China's Inspur rumored to be joining Apple server supply chain

An Apple datacenter in Maiden, North Carolina.

A Chinese server vendor, Inspur, has allegedly joined Apple's datacenter supply chain, as the iPhone maker continues to work toward bringing more of its cloud services in-house.

Inspur is backed by the Chinese government, and a major player in the country's internet service server market, as noted by DigiTimes. Some of the company's existing clients are said to include Alibaba, Baidu, Microsoft, IBM, VMware, and Red Hat.

The firm also established an office in Apple's home state of California last year, including production, research, and development functions.

Despite owning data centers in places like North Carolina, Apple is still dependent on outside parties like Amazon and Microsoft for some of its cloud infrastructure. The company is moving towards self-sufficient infrastructure in an effort known as "Project McQueen," including purchases of land in Hong Kong and mainland China, which should house future datacenters.

The switch may make more financial sense for Apple than investing in third parties, but the company is also thought be worried about potential backdoors inserted somewhere along the supply chain, something that could be helped by exerting more control. Snooping could, however, still be a concern with a firm like Inspur, since the Chinese government regularly intercepts internet traffic.



19 Comments

SpamSandwich 32917 comments · 19 Years

Perhaps they'd only be supplying non-critical components...like cases?

melgross 33622 comments · 20 Years

I thought Apple was working on Its own servers to prevent backdoors. Why would they have anything to do with a Chinese manufacturer that's partly owned by the government? It seems odd.

but maybe this would only be for servers in China. The Chinese government has stated last year, that all information about Chinese citizens, and I suppose, really, all traffic, needs to remain in China, somewhat like the EU has come up with in a new law. One might say, as these governments have said, that it's to prevent information about their people from ending up where it shouldn't be, out of the country.

but the real reason is that it's easier to monitor that information when the servers are physically within the territory. An additional reason is that, this way, if they want to, they can simply seize the server farms physically. They can't do that at all if they reside outside of their territory.

in that case, it doesn't matter where the servers come from.

rogifan_new 4297 comments · 9 Years

Perhaps they'd only be supplying non-critical components...like cases?

Ben Thompson discussed Apple and the cloud on one of his recent podcasts. He doesn't agree with Apple bringing it all in house and thinks Apple should either buy Dropbox and keep it as a subsidiary or partner with Microsoft. I agree. It's one thing to control the entire widget with respect to devices but the cloud isn't Apple's strength so why not partner with someone who is strong in that area? Then Apple can focus on improving the services on top of the cloud. 

melgross 33622 comments · 20 Years

Perhaps they'd only be supplying non-critical components...like cases?
Ben Thompson discussed Apple and the cloud on one of his recent podcasts. He doesn't agree with Apple bringing it all in house and thinks Apple should either buy Dropbox and keep it as a subsidiary or partner with Microsoft. I agree. It's one thing to control the entire widget with respect to devices but the cloud isn't Apple's strength so why not partner with someone who is strong in that area? Then Apple can focus on improving the services on top of the cloud. 

Unlike Amazon, Alphabet, IBM, Microsoft and others, Apple isn't interested in building a general purpose cloud—yet. Apple's cloud is just for the use of their own customers, and isn't even general purpose for them either—yet.

it makes sense. One complaint they have been having with Amazon, is that their cloud is too slow. Apple also has been using Azure, and they're moving at least some functions from Amazon.

apple once before tried to buy Dropbox, and was spurned. I don't know what makes Thompson think it would go any better now, and Dropbox would be far more expensive at this point, and we know how Apple feels about expensive purchases. It would cost them less to built out by themselves. They can always hire the experienced people they need.