Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Apple joins wide array of tech companies in fight to kill EU's 'Cookie Law'

Last updated

Apple and a cadre of other tech companies are fighting the European Union's so-called "Cookie Law," lobbying the organization for more refined laws that aim to strike a balance between user privacy and data collected by providers.

The filing, submitted just hours before a July 5 public comment deadline, states that a similar law, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), should be the framework for "a comprehensive set of horizontal rules ensuring high levels of data protection" for citizens of the EU. The parties would prefer the GDPR over expansion of the widely criticized ePrivacy Directive.

"We believe that simplifying and streamlining regulation will benefit consumers by ensuring they are provided with a simple, consistent, and meaningful set of rules designed to protect their personal data," the industry group said http://www.gsma.com/newsroom/press-release/empowering-trust-innovation-repealing-e-privacy-directive/">in its statement. "At the same time, it will encourage innovation across the digital value chain and drive new growth and social opportunities. This is critical at a time when digital companies are striving to launch new innovative services and working to build a 5G Europe."

The ePrivacy Directive, effective May 26, 2012, is an attempt to regulate a number of internet-specific issues, including confidentiality of user information, how data is handled and retained by providers, spam regulation, and browser cookie implementation under one law. Many of the provisions in the ePrivacy Directive overlap other EU laws and policies, such as the GDPR.

The public comment period on the ePrivacy Directive was querying respondents to see if widening the law to voice-over-IP, and social media networking was appropriate. The disseminated questions about the law also asked about if there should be updated legislation on personal data breaches, location data, and further protections on privacy of various communication methods on the Internet.

The industry group is seeking as yet unspecified "appropriate legal instruments" rather than continuation of the wide-reaching ePrivacy Directive.

The coalition includes Apple, Amazon, BT, Blackberry, Dropbox, eBay, Facebook, Fastnet, Foursquare, Google, Huawei, LinkedIn, Microsoft, Netflix, Orange, Paypal, T-Mobile, TalkTalk, Telefonica, Three, and Vodafone.



29 Comments

ireland 17436 comments · 18 Years

The cookie thing is a pain in the butt.

cropr 1143 comments · 11 Years

ireland said:
The cookie thing is a pain in the butt.

Well I think it needs to be  there.  Facebook is using tracking cookies even for users who don't have a Facebook account.  It one is really concerned about privacy, the end-user must be informed that a website is using cookies to track his movements of the web.

Normally Apple claims to respect the privacy of the user, but here Apple takes an opposite position, which I don't understand.

boopthesnoot 73 comments · 8 Years

Apple fighting the good fight against tracking cookies.  Once again differentiating themselves from greedy companies like Google who want all the private data they can get.

VisualSeed 217 comments · 8 Years

cropr said:
ireland said:
The cookie thing is a pain in the butt.
Well I think it needs to be  there.  Facebook is using tracking cookies even for users who don't have a Facebook account.  It one is really concerned about privacy, the end-user must be informed that a website is using cookies to track his movements of the web.

Normally Apple claims to respect the privacy of the user, but here Apple takes an opposite position, which I don't understand.

Apple is not advocating abandonment of the privacy goals of the law. They are asking for the law to be simplified so it can more easily, and reliability, implemented which means better and consistent enforcement. Currently there is a lot of overlap between multiple governing bodies with conflicting regulations. A lot of times regulators come up with solutions to problems that ignore market realities or the abilities or limitations of technology. 

Hárbarðr 4 comments · 8 Years

cropr said:
ireland said:
The cookie thing is a pain in the butt.
Well I think it needs to be  there.  Facebook is using tracking cookies even for users who don't have a Facebook account.  It one is really concerned about privacy, the end-user must be informed that a website is using cookies to track his movements of the web.

Normally Apple claims to respect the privacy of the user, but here Apple takes an opposite position, which I don't understand.

I hate tracking too, but the law needs to go. Except for some annoyance for users and a bit more for website operators it accomplishes nothing. After reading the warning, agreeing or disagreeing, the user is just as informed as without the warning. It is stupid and pointless.