Roger Fingas
A Washington think tank — with board members from Apple, Amazon, Google and other tech firms — on Thursday called for an international coalition to pressure China into changing course on some of its economic policies.
"America cannot respond with either flaccid appeasement or economic nationalism; it must assemble an international coalition that pressures China to stop rigging markets and start competing on fair terms," the Information Technology & Innovation Foundation wrote, according to Reuters. The organization complained that three previous U.S. administrations had "failed" to engage Chinese officials, and that China is more resistant to pressure now since it's less economically dependent on the U.S.
ITIF called for the coalition to include Australia, Canada, Germany, Japan, South Korea, the U.K., the U.S., and the European Union. It also suggest that U.S. President Donald Trump should focus on trade issues with China, not Mexico, although it warned that the Chinese government could punish American firms in retaliation.
A focal point of criticism is believed to be the Chinese government's "Made in China 2025" program, which is intended to ramp up the number of domestically-made products across 10 different industries. One target includes growing the number of local parts used in tech to 70 percent, through a combination of measures like subsidies, standards, policies, and government-backed investment funds.
Another issue is control over data, since in June new laws will require "critical information infrastructure operators" to store personal and business data in China, as well as offer "technical support" to security agencies, and submit themselves to national security reviews.
Opposing the data laws is likely of special interest to Apple, since the company has adopted tough privacy stances elsewhere, and might have to build new infrastructure to comply. It has also dealt with online store closures and repeated censorship efforts.
To reach the lucrative Chinese market, though, Apple has appeased the government in some ways, for instance by keeping ads out of critical publications.
Parts may also be a relevant issue since while many of Apple's suppliers are already Chinese, others are based in places like Japan and South Korea — some of those firms could be pushed out of the supply chain.
-m.jpg)
Malcolm Owen
Amber Neely
Christine McKee
Chip Loder
Marko Zivkovic
9 Comments
The ChiComs aren't in a strong of a position as many think. They have an aging population, rising wages making them unattractive to foreign companies, widespread government corruption issues, a joke of a military...there should be plenty of pain points to hit them on.
Yesterday a Chinese official was in the newspaper threatening that the US is more vulnerable to a trade war than China. That's like Trump talking about his big hands and the historic size of the crowd at his inauguration. Reveal your deeper insecurity by insisting on the opposite, loudly and repeatedly.
When Foxconn-Apple finally has plants outside of China filled with robots and domestic (Indian?) workers, it will have more options for resisting Chinese meddling-sabotage than it does today. It would be terrible if (hypothetically) China banned new iPhone sales in that nation, but even worse if Chinese regulators impeded iPhone manufacturing at Chinese-based plants. That would block iPhone sales everywhere.
In the long run, a trade war with China may be the only way to get its leaders to moderate their views. No bully will stop bullying until circumstances force him to reconsider the error of his ways.
China compete on fair terms? LOL. I was in China years ago on business and they were selling 'gray market' Nike sneakers on the street for 10 US dollars. These weren't knockoffs but the real thing - made in the same factories (they run them in stealth mode, often after hours).
Think what you will about Trump, at least he has an initiative to bring manufacturing & intellectual property back to the US.
"Apple-backed" in the headline is misleading. Apple staff and board members serve on lots of boards. That doesn't make them all "Apple-backed." Show me where on the Web site it shows Apple as a member or a sponsor and I'll concede. I looked and didn't see any mention of Apple anywhere.