Apple Inc. has placed the blame for missing its self-imposed Leopard release date on its itty-bitty iPhone device, but analysts on Wall Street suspect other culprits — such as a widely touted but so far elusive set of "top secret" features destined for the next-generation Mac OS.
Gene Munster, a Sr. Analyst over at PiperJaffray, was similarly suspect of Apple's explanation, but chose to note the irony of the situation as it relates to rival Microsoft Corp. rather than point the finger at any one Apple initiative. "While we are not convinced the delay is entirely related to the iPhone, the important part is we believe Apple's product development remains robust, and the iPhone, Leopard, and other new products (announced in June) are coming," he wrote in a note to Apple investors. "Despite the PR black-eye Apple will get from delaying Leopard (given Apple routinely chastises Microsoft for product delays), the announcement included that Apple will release the iPhone on time in June."
Acknowledging that there are few certainties when it comes to specific release dates for high-profile Apple products, Munster said he sees the company's statement, while disappointing on the Leopard front, as a likely means of boosting confidence in a June arrival of the iPhone. "Apples track record at getting hardware out on time is hit or miss, as evidence by the recent one month slip of Apple TV," he said. "Apple's statement specified late June as the launch date of the iPhone, but Apple may deliver it earlier at the Worldwide Developers Conference, which begins on June 11."
Unlike Wu, who recently told clients that some prospective Mac buyers had already begun withholding their new computer purchases in anticipation of Leopard, Munster said he has observed "little-to-no delay" in that regard. In his note to clients, the PiperJaffray analyst said he believes Leopard is poised to serve as a catalyst for Mac sales whenever Apple gets around to shipping it. For the meantime, he's shifted an estimated 8 cents in earnings-per-share (or 2.6 percent) from the June '07 and Sept. '07 quarters into the Dec. '07 and March '08 quarters.
For his part, Wu said his recent reduction in near-term Mac assumptions already reflects the risk exposed by Leopard's delay. "We believe consensus sell-side estimates continue to be unsurprisingly aggressive and need to reset closer to ours," he told clients. "We view this delay in Leopard and reset in sell-side estimates as short-term issues. We see worst case downside risk to $80-85."
77 Comments
The stock is taking nowhere near a hit as I thought it would.
Are traders getting smarter?
I am a buyer at 80.
The stock is taking nowhere near a hit as I thought it would.
Are traders getting smarter?
No, they either (a) don't see Leopard as a big money-maker, and, as such, weren't planning on it having much of an effect on sales, and/or (b) WWDC is still months away, and traders tend not to get all excited over things 2 weeks away, let alone 2 months.
But I'm just seeing this as more confirmation of my belief that the "super secret features" Jobs announced way back when were first heard about at apple at the same time, and they've been pushing the past nine months to come up with ideas to match the hype, then program them.
I am a buyer at 80.
Ha! I'm a buyer at $12. Before it split!
Then again, I'm also a seller at $25, so I guess it doesn't count, huh?
No, they either (a) don't see Leopard as a big money-maker, and, as such, weren't planning on it having much of an effect on sales, and/or (b) WWDC is still months away, and traders tend not to get all excited over things 2 weeks away, let alone 2 months.
Leopard will certainly be source of revenue and profit, it's just the iPhone is even more important, especially to investors -- it's a potential opportunity for *massive* growth into an emerging market.
But I'm just seeing this as more confirmation of my belief that the "super secret features" Jobs announced way back when were first heard about at apple at the same time, and they've been pushing the past nine months to come up with ideas to match the hype, then program them.
I don't think I agree.
Aqua was a 2-year project.
If Apple is indeed planning a considerable UI refresh (as many, many, many hints suggest) they will have almost certainly started well before even Tiger's release date.
These kinds of things take a lot of time.
The 4 mo. delay seems to me more than anything the need to get the iPhone out on time (QA especially is a limited resource, and more OS X engineers than expected may been needed for the iPhone OS) *and* give developers time to tweak their apps for a very refreshed OS that pushes the envelope in design.