Katie MarsalA new report from Reuters said that the most likely scenario for both companies to not be engaged in a lengthy suit is if they can reach a licensing deal outside of the courts. But analysts believe it is likely that Apple will countersue Nokia for its own patents and allege separate infringement.
"This type of tit-for-tat approach has occurred in previous patent battles as each player tries to improve its negotiating position," said Ben Wood, research director at CCS Insight.
In addition, the report said that the fight between the two massive companies could become even more complex, spilling over to Europe like the Nokia-Qualcomm battle, and possibly ending up in the hands of the U.S. International Trade Commission. The original complaint was filed in October in a U.S. District Court in Delaware. That case, experts said, could be stayed until an ITC decision.
Nokia has alleged that Apple violated ten patents it owns. Nokia claims ownership of technology related to Global System for Mobile communications (GSM); wireless local area network (WLAN); and Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UTMS). The Finnish company has argued that it has invested more than 40 billion Euros into research and development in the last two decades, giving it a broad portfolio of patents. The company has entered into license agreements with about 40 companies for these patents.
Nokia's suit specifically cites 10 patents that cover wireless data, speech coding, security and encryption. It has alleged that all iPhone models released since 2007 infringe on these patents.
Analyst Gene Munster with Piper Jaffray has predicted that Nokia is looking to obtain a patent royalty of 1 percent to 2 percent, or $6 to $12, on every iPhone sold. Other estimates cited by Reuters suggest Nokia seeks compensation in the range of $200 million to $1 billion.
Though Apple's formal response, and potential countersuit, is expected soon, the company has not yet made any moves. Apple did, in its annual Form 10-K filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, note that it will "vigorously" defend itself against Nokia's complaint.
Analysts who spoke with Reuters said a settlement might be the best option for both companies. The situation is particularly difficult because it is said to be "unlikely" a company could create a mobile phone without using Nokia-patented technology. And Nokia doesn't want to "kill the goose with the golden egg" either, said Steven Nathasingh, managing director of U.S. research firm Vaxa Inc.
"They both have something to gain if they can put their heads together for a win-win," he said.
-m.jpg)
Charles Martin
Christine McKee
Wesley Hilliard
Malcolm Owen
Andrew Orr
William Gallagher
Sponsored Content
41 Comments
This will be another example of the early bird losing the worm later on, when the judge decides that Nokia cannot continue to claim patents on every aspect of mobile communication.
... The Finnish company has argued that it has invested more than 40 billion Euros into research and development in the last two decades, giving it a broad portfolio of patents. ...
Just to be picky, you guys have used this phrase in two stories on the subject now and it's pretty much nonsensical.
Nokia *has* put 40 billion into R&D and it *does* have a wide patent of portfolios, but this is not their "argument" nor can it be. Those are just two facts, the argument they have has yet to be presented other than the plain fact that they think Apple infringes on those patents.
Just to be picky, you guys have used this phrase in two stories on the subject now and it's pretty much nonsensical.
Nokia *has* put 40 billion into R&D and it *does* have a wide patent of portfolios, but this is not their "argument" nor can it be. Those are just two facts, the argument they have has yet to be presented other than the plain fact that they think Apple infringes on those patents.
Are you what's considered "a stickler for details"?
There's a surprisingly informative analysis of this dispute over at Engagdet. It's definitely worth a read.
Just to be picky
If you are a jobless lawyer, consider yourself hired very soon.