Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Congress requests privacy briefing in letter to Apple CEO Tim Cook

Last updated

In a letter to Tim Cook on Wednesday, members of a U.S. Congress subcommittee requested that Apple send a representative to Washington to brief government officials on what the company is doing to protect the personal information stored on iOS devices.

The House Committee on Energy and Commerce claims that Cook's initial response to a letter sent in February regarding iOS privacy practices was insufficient, and is asking that Apple give more detailed information as to what the company is doing to protect its customers, reports VentureBeat.

Representative Henry A. Waxman, ranking member of the Energy and Commerce Committee, and ranking member of the Subcommittee on Commerce, Manufacturing, and Trade, Rep. G.K. Butterfield, write that Apple's March 2nd response did "not answer a number of the questions we raised about the company’s efforts to protect the privacy and security of its mobile device users."

The officials go on to voice concern over certain iOS apps having access to photos as well as unnamed "tools" provided by Apple that can lead to unwanted "online tracking." It is unclear whether the statement is in regard to a recent call for an FTC investigation over a loophole that allows an app to upload photos if it authorized to access location data. Because the photos were geo-tagged, it is conceivable that a user's could be tracked as long as they kept taking pictures with location data turned on.

The security of iOS was first questioned when it was discovered that social networking app "Path" was uploading information from users' address books to its servers without first asking permission. The so-called "feature" was meant to allow for a more streamlined experience when adding friends, and in doing so illustrated a vulnerability that could be exploited by malicious apps to retrieve a user's personal information.

Shortly after the discovery, Path issued an apology and changed the way it handled sensitive information. Apple followed suit and updated iOS, requiring that apps first ask for user permission before accessing a device's address book.



46 Comments

solipsismx 13 Years · 19562 comments

it's amazing that the focus is on Apple's mobile devices when throughout the history of computing if an app has access to the user space it also has access to user's photos, contacts, browser history, etc. Even now some app you install on my Mac or Win PC could be collecting data without you knowing. Hopefully that Mac App Store sandboxing prevents this but that remains to be seen what areas it can read.

k2director 19 Years · 194 comments

I'm so glad our Congress was finally able to solve our gargantuan deficit, our crumbling infrastructure, our failing schools, the money-sucking Post Office, etc. etc. etc., and now has time to focus on what *really* matters, like privacy issues on mobile phones.

galbi 14 Years · 927 comments

This is a price to pay for having the biggest thumb.

Nobody said being "#1" was easy.

solipsismx 13 Years · 19562 comments

Quote:
Originally Posted by k2director

I'm so glad our Congress was finally able to solve our gargantuan deficit, our crumbling infrastructure, our failing schools, the money-sucking Post Office, etc. etc. etc., and now has time to focus on what *really* matters, like privacy issues on mobile phones.

I don't think it's fair to expect that everything else to be dropped to focus on a single issue, no matter how important. Surely a country or business couldn't function if everyone was doing the same task and no other task.

adonissmu 14 Years · 1758 comments

Quote:
Originally Posted by SolipsismX

I don't think it's fair to expect that everything else to be dropped to focus on a single issue, no matter how important. Surely a country or business couldn't function if everyone was doing the same task and no other task.

huh?! what do you mean?

The guy was pointing out other more important issues that are far more deserving their attention far more than this is.