Amazon on Wednesday asked a federal judge to throw out an ongoing court case Apple leveled against the online retail giant for allegedly misusing the "App Store" name, saying the term has become so widespread that it is now generic.
Apple first filed suit against Amazon in March 2011 for using the "App Store" trademark in its online store for Android apps, and added the false advertising claim in November the same year after the "Amazon Appstore for Android" changed to the "Amazon Appstore." The Cupertino company asserts the name change possibly confused consumers.
In its filing on Wednesday, Amazon countered, claiming the "app store" moniker has become generic and therefore cannot constitute false advertising. The company went further, noting that Apple CEO Tim Cook and late cofounder Steve Jobs used the name to describe competitors, with Cook having referred to "the number of app stores out there" and Jobs noting the "four app stores on Android."
"Apple presumably does not contend that its past and current CEOs made false statements regarding to those other app stores to thousands of investors in earnings calls," Amazon said. "To the contrary, the use of the term 'app store' to refer to stores selling apps is commonplace in the industry."
U.S. trademark law leaves the defense of name use up to owners, and a failure to effectively protect a property can result in a trademark becoming a generic description of a service or product, as Amazon argues regarding its use of "app store."
50 Comments
FACT: 'App Store" Does Not Equal 'Appstore', whether Apple likes it or not.
I'm not sure their new name constitutes 'false advertising', but I am also not sure that I understand the entirety of what the phrase 'false advertising' can contain.
To me it sounds more like 'deceptive advertising', but perhaps that's a term too specific to be considered legally defined.
FACT: 'App Store" Does Not Equal 'Appstore', whether Apple likes it or not.
Start a computer company called "AppleInc" and we'll see how far that gets you.
I'm not sure their new name constitutes 'false advertising', but I am also not sure that I understand the entirety of what the phrase 'false advertising' can contain.
To me it sounds more like 'deceptive advertising', but perhaps that's a term too specific to be considered legally defined.
Start a computer company called "AppleInc" and we'll see how far that gets you.
I think I'll drink some cocacola, I just invented it.
> I think I'll drink some cocacola i almost got out of my chair to sue you, before i realised you hadn't written co cacola, which i may or may not happen to have invented. but which i will not, in any case, consume, since it is only likely to dissolve my intestines and make me fat prior to that (just like the other thing). i guess the meat of the issue lies in how many others used app store (with or without the space) before apple decided to sue amazon. if many, then i guess apple has less of a defence about it having become generic. if amazon were the first copiers (or re-inventers if you prefer) then logically speaking, it becomes justifiable that apple sued them, and is holding off on whoever else has made it a "generic" term, until the outcome of this case if known.
FACT: 'App Store" Does Not Equal 'Appstore', whether Apple likes it or not.
Start a computer company called "AppleInc" and we'll see how far that gets you.
Typical DaHarder drive-by trolling...