Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Apple poaching suit potentially tied to A123's high-performance electric vehicle batteries

The Venturi Buckeye Bullet 3 land speed racing vehicle uses A123 battery technology.

A123 Systems, which filed a lawsuit this month accusing Apple of unfairly poaching its engineers, is best known for creating large lithium-ion batteries used in futuristic high-performance electric automobiles, a specialty that may have played a key role in Apple's interest in its employees.

The lawsuit from A123 comes as a flurry of rumors have claimed Apple has begun work on a top-secret electric car project codenamed "Titan."

While A123's complaint does not say exactly what its supposedly-poached engineers were working on, the lawsuit accuses Apple of hiring high-level employees "under suspicious circumstances." And A123 has an established track record of building batteries for a variety of vehicle types, ranging from passenger cars to commercial trucks.

In one particularly impressive example, A123's prismatic batteries power the Venturi Buckeye Bullet 3, an electric land speed racing vehicle. As noted by MacPlus, the Venturi team hopes to make the VBB-3 reach a record shattering ground speed of 700 kilometers per hour, or 435 miles per hour.

An inside look at the VBB-3's batteries.

A123's batteries were already used in part of the 2010 land speed challenge in the VBB-2.5 model, replacing the fuel cells of Venturi's previous model. That posted a then-record speed of 307.58 miles per hour.

For more traditional consumer-focused vehicle uses, A123's nanophosphate lithium-ion batteries are also found in the Chevrolet Spark EV, which was released in select markets in the U.S. in June 2013. The plug-in hybrid Fisker Karma also utilizes A123 technology, among other vehicles.

Batteries, of course, are a core part of almost all of Apple's products, including the iPhone, iPad, and its MacBook lineup. So it would come as no surprise that Apple is interested in hiring engineers experienced in advanced battery technology.

A123 technology also powers the Fisker Karma plug-in hybrid.

But A123 and its engineers have historically specialized in bigger batteries — the type that are well-suited for electric and hybrid cars.

And Apple is now heavily rumored to be experimenting with an electric, self-driving car featuring "several hundred" workers, some of which were formerly employees of Ford, Mercedes-Benz, and Tesla.

Filed earlier this month, the lawsuit from A123 Systems accuses Apple of poaching workers with proprietary information vital to its operations. Specifically, key members from A123's advanced System Venture Technologies Division were said to have been hired by Apple, and their loss was so devastating that the company shut down individual projects assigned to each worker.

A123 tech is found in the Chevrolet Spark EV, which is available in limited markets.

A123 Systems went public in 2009, but by October of 2012 it filed for bankruptcy. Since then, it has been gradually selling off its assets, including the automotive division, which was purchased by Johnson Controls.

A123's complaint specifically mentions Johnson Controls in the suit, along with LG, Panasonic, Samsung, and Toshiba, saying that Apple has targeted employees from those companies who have knowledge of A123's battery technology.

The lawsuit claims that Apple's "aggressive campaign to poach employees" started in June of 2014, well after the bankruptcy filing came. The complaint also accuses former A123 employees of violating non-disclosure, non-competition, and non-solicitation agreements.

For now, the market leader in electric vehicle battery technology is Panasonic, which has helped create much of Tesla's technology through a joint venture. Panasonic is also a partner, set to invest hundreds of millions of dollars, into Tesla's so-called "gigafactory" in Nevada.

If Apple does plan to release an electric car at some point in the future, Panasonic's close partnerships with Tesla, which see it supply 100 percent of the automaker's lithium-ion cells, could prove to be a roadblock. That's yet another potential reason for the company to recruit engineers and develop its own proprietary battery technology in-house.



48 Comments

zoetmb 2655 comments · 17 Years

So Apple (and other companies) get sued for allegedly agreeing to not poach employees from each other and now Apple gets sued for allegedly poaching employees?   And they only poached the employees after the company was in bankruptcy.   Of course the employees wanted to leave.    

 

What's wrong with this picture?

 

In spite of ever-increasing evidence, I still find it really hard to believe that Apple wants to produce and sell a car.    

mstone 11503 comments · 18 Years

You hear people saying that "green" electric cars are better for the environment. They may reduce the overall air pollution in the cities, however the production of Lithium is far from environmentally friendly. It is fairly rare and never found in pure form. There is a lot of electric energy required to extract the usable product required for batteries. Also there is a lot of water required to process Lithium. As electric vehicles increase, the supply of Lithium will probably not be sustainable without considerable damage to the environment.

nofeer 2327 comments · 22 Years

Very interesting bankruptcy?? Wow as an employee of a company in bankruptcy Id like the idea of FINDING ANOTHER JOB It's not viable As a company then move on I said in a related post maybe apple tried to buy them but leadership Didn't get a chance to screw over apple or their Employees like GT did Sooooo apple went around them

jeff-hackintosh 23 comments · 11 Years

Quote:
Originally Posted by sog35 
 

 

brought to you by Exxon Corporation

 

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by mstone 
 

You hear people saying that "green" electric cars are better for the environment. They may reduce the overall air pollution in the cities, however the production of Lithium is far from environmentally friendly. It is fairly rare and never found in pure form. There is a lot of electric energy required to extract the usable product required for batteries. Also there is a lot of water required to process Lithium. As electric vehicles increase, the supply of Lithium will probably not be sustainable without considerable damage to the environment.

No, brought to you by reality.    

canukstorm 2744 comments · 11 Years

Quote:
Originally Posted by sog35 
 

 

No.  Fossil Fuels are much more hazardous to the environment than electric cars.

 

Do some research before you make yourself look foolish

Same could be said of yourself.  You haven't presented any research of your own. Poking fun at others is nothing but a cop out.