Malcolm Owen
The Federal Communications Commission is scheduled to vote on a possible repeal of net neutrality rules later today, but as the decision-making time draws closer, Internet users continue to fight the proposals of FCC Chairman Ajit Pai, taking to Twitter and protesting outside government buildings to pass the message and attempt to influence the result.
The vote, which seeks to reverse Obama-era rules that forces Internet providers to handle all data equally, is set to take place on Thursday at 10:30am ET (7:30 am PT). It is believed that the Republican-dominated FCC will vote in favor of the rollback, with Chairman Pai and Commissioners Michael O'Rielly and Brendan Carr backing Pai's proposal.
In the final minutes before the vote, Internet denizens are attempting to make themselves heard by congregating outside government buildings. The protests have also taken place outside the FCC itself, with citizens bearing signs urging the FCC to reconsider, among other attempts to get the message out.
Protestors have also congregated outside major businesses that would be affected by the decision, including stores for national carrier Verizon.
— Twitter Government (@TwitterGov) December 12, 2017
Online, concerned parties are spreading around messages in images warning of the vote and its potential consequences if it passes. Some users on Twitter are also circulating the contact details for the five-member FCC board, asking others to make contact by tweets, e-mails, and by phone calls.
The online protests are not limited to private individuals, with prominent figures also passing comment. Governor Tom Wolf (Dem, PA) tweeted a link for constituents to look up their members of Congress and to "tell them to oppose the FCC decision to the end."
There's still time to fight for the free and open internet. Look up your Congress members here and tell them to oppose the FCC decision to end #NetNeutrality: https://t.co/OZOHfKsQQz pic.twitter.com/YXiOnmVBuA
— Governor Tom Wolf (@GovernorTomWolf) December 14, 2017
Announced on November 21, Pai's proposal eliminates the rules put in place by the FCC in 2015 that enables net neutrality. The proposal removes the classification of Internet service providers as a common carrier, stripping the legal authority of the FCC to regulate the behavior of providers, and opening up the possibility of so-called Internet "fast lanes."
The previous FCC board "imposed heavy-handed, utility-style regulations upon the Internet," said Pai at the time of the proposal, claiming it "depressed investment in building and expanding broadband networks and deterred innovation." The proposal would keep the federal government from "micromanaging the Internet," claimed the chairman, with the rules instead requiring transparency from providers about their practices.
The FCC will also neuter its supervisory powers under the proposal, passing to the Federal Trade Commission the task of suing companies that break promises made in statements to the public.
Outside my government office #RIPInternet #NetNeutrality pic.twitter.com/Xgwa3dKH3h
— geophf (@geophf) December 13, 2017
Apple has previously written to the FCC in support of Net Neutrality, declaring "Apple remains open to alternative sources of legal authority, but only if they provide for strong, enforceable, and legally sustainable protections, like those in place today. Simply put, the internet is too important to consumers and too essential to innovation to be left unprotected and uncertain."
The vote will be available to watch in a live stream from the FCC website.
-m.jpg)
William Gallagher
Wesley Hilliard
Mike Wuerthele
Christine McKee
Sponsored Content
29 Comments
It is what it is - Pai has always stridently followed his party line, there was never really any doubt what would happen if he became chairman - his party won the election - losing has consequences. I hope my preferred party wins next time, in the meantime I register my opposition to the removal of net neutrality rules and I suck it up.
If you don't like the product they want to sell you then don't buy it. Would you buy a car from a company if you knew sometimes or on some roads is would not go over 20 miles an hour. So the only effective recourse we have is to not buy the product. As impractical or unfeasible that may be. Welcome to Capitalism at it's best.