Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

New Samsung ad attacks iPhone X download speed, ignores performance benchmarks

Last updated

Samsung's latest ad attacking the iPhone compares the download speeds of iPhone X to that of the Galaxy S9 while at the same time poking fun at Apple Store employees.

The ad, titled "Ingenious: Speed," is set within a bright retail environment clearly meant to reflect an Apple store. It starts off with a woman waiting to be helped by an employee. Quickly, the worker, complete with an Apple logo t-shirt, approaches to make a sale.

When asked about iPhone X's download speeds, the employee boasts they are faster than those of iPhone 8. She responds with apprehension, looking for confirmation that iPhone X is not as fast at downloading data as the Galaxy S9. Her query renders the employee speechless, with his only response being an unending, "Ummmm..."

Samsung touts data obtained from Ookla's Speedtest Intelligence Data obtained February through April of 2018 as the basis for the claim. Weighted average download speeds of all major LTE carriers were compared.

In our own testing of the S9+ vs iPhone X, we saw no such numbers, largely due to the actual speeds we were able to achieve in our area. Others out there, where faster speeds were available, were able to achieve some pretty remarkable download results on the S9 and S9+.

Regardless, the ad clearly doesn't step into other, arguably more crucial, areas of phone performance where our tests had iPhone X in a clear lead. Looking at the Geekbench results, iPhone X completely destroys the S9+, especially in single core performance. The iPhone came in with single- and multi-core scores of 4,243 and 10,433, respectively, while the S9+ managed scores of 2,007 and 8,307.

Graphics-wise, iPhone X still outpaced the S9+. The S9+ scored 14,308, very close to, but not topping, iPhone's 15,177. In all our testing, there were a couple tests where the S9+ won out, but by-and-large the iPhone X was the more powerful device.

Next year, Samsung is expected to release the Galaxy S10 and S10+, which will most likely attempt to more evenly compete with Face ID. Currently, the S9 and S9+ use a 2D scanner when validating a face and is much less accurate than Apple's 3D infrared TrueDepth camera system.



42 Comments

🍪
Latko 7 Years · 398 comments

Different worlds:
When unable to produce a charger, what priority would 1.3% faster downloads have.
Anyway, everybody his favorite thing.
Happy claiming at the Apple servicedesk...

❄️
Soli 9 Years · 9981 comments

You know you're losing when all your ads have to focus on a competitor so much that you have their devices and logos plastered on screen for most of it.

I doubt that Samsung is really expecting to convert iPhone users with this ad. I'd say it's more geared toward those that already hate Apple—for whatever reason—and aren't certain what Android-based smartphone to buy.

🍪
Soli 9 Years · 9981 comments

Latko said:
...what priority would 1.3% faster downloads have.

I don't think it comes to that. Even if the Samsung device has faster theoretical throughput for cellular and/or WiFi, it's a moot point if your connection to the tower, WiFi Router, and/or ISP backbone can't begin to handle that capacity. That's why I'm fine with Apple using Intel chips over Qualcomm, even if Qualcomm's chips allow for better Tx/Rx speeds.

edit: So the Galaxy S9+ has a CAT 18 LTE modem which has a theoretical download speed of 1.2Gibps. So what does that mean in real world use for loading a website? Or uploading a video to Dropbox?

🎄
racerhomie3 7 Years · 1264 comments

Don’t even give them the extra view. It’s pathetic .

🎁
eightzero 14 Years · 3149 comments

My first thought was someone at Samesung decided, "lets make an ad that includes an Apple trademark and other representations of their IP and see if their lawyers sue us so we get free publicity."