Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Apple Store suppliers suffering through longer payment terms, consignment model

Last updated

Accessory producers and other suppliers who provide products for Apple's retail outlets have to wait longer before being paid by the company, a store claims, with changes in terms also making them responsible for unsold products.

Apple has reportedly made changes to the way it handles products it receives from suppliers for sale in the online and physical Apple Store. Suppliers who do not agree with the new terms reportedly risk their placement on Apple's shelves, with the changes considerably benefiting Apple.

After providing distribution for its retail stores to a new provider, The Telegraph reports Apple has made demands to suppliers directly, and in an inflexible way. Suppliers told the report that terms were previously negotiated with distribution companies, but the new ones were set by Apple and are not negotiable.

The changes include a change in how long a supplier waits for payment, increasing the time from 45 days to 60. Suppliers also have to accept a "consignment model," in that they are paid only once an item is sold.

The non-negotiable nature of the changes does at least mean all suppliers have the same deal with Apple, but the dependence on sales via Apple also means most are likely to accept them. Vendors are also reportedly anticipating a squeeze on cash flow from the changes.

"They are not doing their vendors any favors," said one unnamed supplier. "Their vendors face cash challenges that they don't. I don't think anyone's going to turn them down. There's very little competition for the brand exposure that you get with Apple. It's certainly a squeeze."

An Apple spokesperson said "We deeply value the close relationship we have with the world-class companies who sell their products via Apple.com and in our stores. Apple regularly assesses the assortment of the third-party products we sell and the structure of our models to provide vendors the ability to reliably and confidently grow their business."

The change to suppliers isn't the only way Apple is trying to improve its retail position. In August 2020, it made a request to landlords in the U.K. to cut the amount of rent it pays by half or to secure free rental periods, in exchange for lease extensions.



24 Comments

☕️
DAalseth 6 Years · 3072 comments

You see, this is the kind of crap that will get Apple in trouble. 

☕️
elijahg 18 Years · 2843 comments

DAalseth said:
You see, this is the kind of crap that will get Apple in trouble. 

Well the $500 credit for the DTKs has to come from somewhere, obviously... 

🎅
iOS_Guy80 5 Years · 906 comments

I wonder how many people buy third party products   in an Apple store. Having the products in the Apple store is a smart way for a company to promote their products. Let the consumer decide if they want to make a purchase in the Apple store or go online or to a big box store.

🎄
tommikele 12 Years · 599 comments

DAalseth said:
You see, this is the kind of crap that will get Apple in trouble. 

Why is that? And what is the trouble you speak of. And what "crap" is that? Trouble? Seriously, explain your comment.   Stop throwing vague "crap" (your word, not mine) like that out there. You want the government to stop this? You want a law passed?

Changing the payment terms to 60 is pretty lame. Going to a consignment model is not. It's been in use by many industries for decades and still is. Unsold inventory goes back to the manufacturer and they get paid for what they sell. It's part of the price they pay for having the sales outlet. The seller does not accept inventory risk.It's called smart business and cash management. Ever buy goods through Amazon and return something that came from a third party supplier? Every buy clothing in a retail store? I don't think you understand how common this is in retail sales of non-perishable goods? You think Walmart and Target pay suppliers for unsold inventory of non-perishable goods? You think any big retailer pays up front when they don't have to? It's the price you pay to do business with them. Worth the risk for most of them.

🕯️
Anilu_777 8 Years · 579 comments

tommikele said:
DAalseth said:
You see, this is the kind of crap that will get Apple in trouble. 
Why is that? And what is the trouble you speak of. And what "crap" is that? Trouble? Seriously, explain your comment.   Stop throwing vague "crap" (your word, not mine) like that out there. You want the government to stop this? You want a law passed?

Changing the payment terms to 60 is pretty lame. Going to a consignment model is not. It's been in use by many industries for decades and still is. Unsold inventory goes back to the manufacturer and they get paid for what they sell. It's part of the price they pay for having the sales outlet. The seller does not accept inventory risk.It's called smart business and cash management. Ever buy goods through Amazon and return something that came from a third party supplier? Every buy clothing in a retail store? I don't think you understand how common this is in retail sales of non-perishable goods? You think Walmart and Target pay suppliers for unsold inventory of non-perishable goods? You think any big retailer pays up front when they don't have to? It's the price you pay to do business with them. Worth the risk for most of them.

Agree with most of this. In addition, big box retailers such as Walmart, Target and especially Costco have to arrange an agreement for what happens when a customer returns an item. I’m sure that Costco’s agreements reflect their return policy. Whereas Apple and others have only a short return period. But for small sellers waiting 60 days for payment is an unreasonable hardship from a company the size of Apple. Apple needs to take care of its suppliers in a kinder way.