Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Twitter staff nearly decimated by Musk's 'extremely hardcore' demand

Last updated

Minutes after the deadline for Twitter CEO Elon Musk's demand that engineers sign up for "extremely hardcore" working hours and conditions expired, offices are locked, access badges don't work, and concerns grow that World Cup traffic will kill the service.

On Friday, Musk sent an email to the 3,700 employees that remained of nearly 7,600 pre-buy that to launch Twitter 2.0, there would need to be a new focus on work. Specifically, Musk was demanding "hardcore" devotion to work, and long hours from everybody.

He set a deadline of Thursday evening to agree, or be laid off and take three months of severance pay on the way out the door. The deadline has passed, and the situation appears grim.

In multiple reports across the Internet, and ironically, Twitter, it appears that a large percentage of Twitter's workforce have rejected Musk's demand of longer, harder hours in service of the company.

In a report collated by The Verge, exiting employees are expecting the service to start breaking even more severely than it has as of late. The departures may be as high as 75% of the 3,700 remaining employees after two weeks of chaos.

If the 75% total is correct, that leaves about 900 employees remaining, versus the 7,600 that were working just two weeks ago.

Shortly after this was made public, Twitter locked the doors. AppleInsider has confirmed this with an employee who told us that they were staying only until they could pin down another development job.

The same employee told us that the action was initiated by Musk, to prevent sabotage to critical systems by disgruntled employees. Offices will re-open on November 21, and employees, both current and ex-, are being directed to not divulge critical information about the service.

Compounding the problem, the World Cup begins on November 20. Some of the service's highest posting rate has happened during prior World Cup tournaments, specifically just after a goal was scored, and when the match ends. We've been told that that period has historically been incredibly challenging for the company to keep the service functioning well.

"It feels like all the people who made this place incredible are leaving," one Twitter staffer told The Verge on Thursday evening. "It will be extremely hard for Twitter to recover from here, no matter how hardcore the people who remain try to be."

On the evening of November 10, Twitter made the decision to activate the $8 Twitter Blue subscription that entitled purchasers to the same blue check mark that users that went through the verification sport. Overnight on Thursday into Friday, Twitter reinstated the "official" checkmark that it had previously launched and killed, and very shortly thereafter, disabled the ability to purchase Twitter Blue.

It's still unknown whether people who paid their $8 for the first month will revert to the old-style Twitter blue for their next billing period. Also not clear is why Twitter didn't retain the blue checkmark for verified accounts and implement a different color or shape for the paid subscriptions.

One day later, Musk sent his demand to employees about the extreme hours, and considerably more demanding working environment that he was mandating to make Twitter 2.0.



98 Comments

Ofer 8 Years · 270 comments

It’s almost like he deliberately wants to destroy the service…

StrangeDays 8 Years · 12986 comments

lol, watching his public display of incompetence is hilarious. Rich people aren’t any more intelligent or talented, and we’re see more evidence of this tool having failed upward, from his family emerald mine wealth onward. He’s reached his Peter Principle junction. 

DAalseth 6 Years · 3068 comments

I ran across an idea on another site that made me think a bit. It goes like this:
Musk is in hock for most of the $44bn.
But if Twitter goes bankrupt he could be hoping to say it was unsalvageable, and walk away from the debt. 

It would all depend on how the loan was written. If it’s to him personally, then he’s stuck. But if it was that the lender would own a share of Twitter, or if Twitter is on the hook, then it might work. 

Hmmmmm……

(How did he get into this mess? He shot his mouth off, the stock he owned went up and he was facing serious stock manipulation charges from the SEC. Trying to get out of that he ended up here.)