Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Hey Calendar resubmitted with spiteful Apple history feature inspired by successful Kickstarter

In order to spite Apple with a simple feature, Hey decided to give away a digital Apple history calendar for free, inspired by the successful Kickstarter campaign for a physical Apple history calendar.

Apple's history isn't secret or unfindable, nor is the notion of putting it in a calendar. However, David Heinemeier Hansson, aka DHH and co-founder of Basecamp, took the concept from a successful Kickstarter campaign and turned it into a spiteful weapon against App Review.

Hey Calendar was rejected by Apple on January 5 for not functioning without a login. Like with Hey Mail, the company hoped to submit an app and have it treated as a "reader" app like Netflix, which doesn't function without a login.

Apple won't consider either app as a reader app and hasn't disclosed why. Instead, Hey must provide basic functionality to have the app approved.

DHH and his team spent the weekend implementing a new idea for the app as a nod in Apple's direction. They have resubmitted the app with an Apple history calendar that displays if the user hasn't logged in.

The concept on its face is harmless enough. However, DHH went out of his way to point out where the concept's inspiration came from.

The information is public knowledge, so it seems unnecessary to admit they took the idea from Stephen Hackett's Apple History Calendar Kickstarter, gave it to a team of people, and made it free. Hackett's calendar is a physical one, and Hey's move likely won't impact his ability to sell them, but a .ics file is included with the purchase to incentivize users to own a physical calendar in a digital-first world.

DHH could have created a basic holiday calendar or a history of Basecamp but instead took inspiration from someone else's work. Apple's stance against Hey Calendar and previously Hey Email create unnecessary problems, but Hey's solution may have crossed a line.

Since the Hey Calendar app has basic functionality due to this addition, Apple will likely approve the submission.



8 Comments

rorschachai 3 Years · 63 comments

I’m convinced some of these companies deliberately get their app rejected to get free press for their launch. Especially since this is exactly the same issue that their other app got rejected for. They know what they’re doing.

InspiredCode 8 Years · 405 comments

It is a pretty dumb review denial, but I get how it edges on the productivity app space that Apple wouldn’t want to lose out revenue on. 

My opinion is Apple should just require the app to be for the developers first party cloud services only and all functionality must match the web app. Maybe unlist them too and require a link to the store from the website. Since these are web-first services, not a big deal to get them from the website where you need to sign up for them anyway. That also sidesteps the whole steering issue Apple has been getting in trouble for. Maybe even put some entitlement level restrictions on these apps to forbid advanced features and make app review easier. Basically, instead of reader apps these are web-equivalent apps.

BittySon 8 Years · 75 comments

Why anyone would install software from a man with the maturity level of tadpole is beyond me.

mattinoz 9 Years · 2488 comments

BittySon said:
Why anyone would install software from a man with the maturity level of tadpole is beyond me.

Given the number of successful products from men with the maturity level of a tadpole. Email systems seems one of the low potential harm products 

auxio 19 Years · 2766 comments

mattinoz said:
BittySon said:
Why anyone would install software from a man with the maturity level of tadpole is beyond me.
Given the number of successful products from men with the maturity level of a tadpole. Email systems seems one of the low potential harm products 

Giving said tadpole access to your calendar and all of your email is low potential harm?