Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Judge approves settlement in iPod class action suit

A San Mateo County judge on Thursday approved the settlement of a class action suit that will offer relief to as many as 1.3 million iPod owners who may have been victim to poor or defective batteries.

The original lawsuit, filed on behalf of US residents, alleged that Apple failed to disclose the battery limitations of its first three iPod models.

"All these people are going to get relief, and we think that's a big victory for them," Steve Williams, lead counsel for the suit, and an attorney for Burlingame's Cotchett, Pitre, Simon & McCarthy told the San Mateo Times.

The settlement applies to consumers who purchased an iPod model on or before May 31, 2004 and saw the charge of their iPod battery drop to four hours or less on a third-generation iPod, or five hours or less on one of the first two generation models.

Under the settlement, owners of either a first- or second-generation model are entitled to $25 cash or $50 credit at the Apple store. Meanwhile, owners who actually paid Apple to repair a battery in one of the players will be entitled to up to half of that cost back.

Owners of third-generation iPod models are entitled to a free replacement battery if the battery fails.

In order to make claims, iPod owners must submit individual claim forms for each iPod they own as instructed by the Apple iPod Settlement Web site.

For third-generation iPod claims, the postmark deadline for submitting a claim is two years after the original purchase date of the iPod or September 30, 2005, whichever is later. For all other claims, the postmark deadline for submitting a claim is September 30, 2005.

In addition to reimbursing consumers, the original suit also sought attorneys' fees and out-of-pocket expenses in the amount of $2,768,000, and a $1,500 incentive payment to each of the suit's class representatives. Apple did not oppose either reward.

According to lawyers, the settlement could cost Apple as much as $15m in total, which is considerably less than the $100m figured quoted when the settlement was conditionally approved in June



14 Comments

melgross 20 Years · 33622 comments

The amount of the settlement was good news.

But the fact that they got anything at all is not. Rechargable batteries have been around now for four decades. 40 years! If people don't know by now that all rechargable batteries die after a while then it's too bad for them.

I am a strong believer in consumerism, but that ends with some personal responsibility.

This is like that suit against MacDonalds where a woman takes a hot *paper* cup of coffee, puts it between her knees, and starts her car, causing her to move her knees together squashing the cup and spilling coffee over her.

If I were on that jury I would have awarded MacDonalds money.

Too many people seem to want to lead a happy go lucky life where their own stupidity is paid for by someone else.

cosmonut 23 Years · 4663 comments

I think the issue here was not that the batteries degraded in charge life, but HOW QUICKLY they did.

brussell 23 Years · 9645 comments

What happened here? I got my settlement paperwork over a month ago (though I haven't sent it in yet). It wasn't approved yet?

krankerz 20 Years · 50 comments

This is extremely old news. I sent my request form in months ago.