Apple sees more profit per OS user than Microsoft
Slash Lane
By releasing operating system upgrades at a more frequently and stable pace, Apple Computer is able to gain more profitability per user from its OS software than Microsoft, an analyst's study has found.
According to Munster's analysis, Apple releases a new version of Mac OS X about once a year for $129 (or an average of $107 per year to keep current), whereas Microsoft releases new versions of Windows about every 2.25 years for an average cost of $114 a year (or $48 per year to keep current).
"Despite Mac OS X's lower ASP, Windows users pay less per year (by $16) for full versions and significantly less per year for upgrade copies (by $59), in order to have the latest OS for their computer," Munster told his clients in a synopsis of the study. "Apple users therefore pay a premium on an annual basis for more frequent upgrades to Mac OS X, resulting in higher profitability per user for Apple."
The analyst believes Apple's OS pricing strategy is in line with the company's overall strategy, which is that Apple users are willing to pay a premium for hardware and software built for the Apple platform, enabling Apple to expand profit margins.
Credit: PiperJaffray Investment Research
"Given Apple's ability to drive greater revenue per customer versus its competitors through sales of peripherals and frequent OS updates, Mac market share gains will mean more to the company than simply increasing Mac revenue," he said. "Most analyses of the impact of Mac market share gains exclude the positive potential impact on the company's peripherals and software segments, which account for 12 percent of revenue."
The analyst said that it is important to keep this added benefit in mind, as a growing number of Macs in consumer's hands will lift these segments as well.
Munster maintains an "Outperform" rating on shares of Apple Computer with a price target of $99.
Charles Martin
William Gallagher
Andrew Orr
Malcolm Owen
Christine McKee
Chip Loder
62 Comments
Wow, Munster is a great analyst. I would never have figured this out! Hail Munster!
Of course, add in the costs on each platform to keep the machine *running*, much less *current*.
That's the true cost of ownership.
What is this idiot doing! Mr. Munster is trying desperately to keep the myth strong that Apple is Way more expensive than PCs. And that the tremendous delays in Microsoft's ability to release a working OS, is actually because M$ are a bunch of good guys looking out for our spending concerns! WoW! This makes Shaw WU look like a genius! I wonder how much M$ paid Munster to say that useless crap. Or they just told him they would "make him go away" if he did not comply.
Mr. Munster writes "an average of $107 per year to keep current" as compared to "$48 per year", but the release rate from Apple is 2.25 times that of MS. Are you stupid or...?
If you don't like being offered 2.25 times as many upgrades then just ignore them and upgrade once every 2.25 years instead. Interestingly, the upgrade costs are then almost equal ( $48 x 2.25 = $108 )!
Didn't Apple say that the OS updates would be coming less frequently now? I seem to remember that. They've been coming quickly because OSX was new and had so much room for obvious improvement.