Monday, October 12, 2009, 11:05 pm
Lessons learned from Steve Jobs' illness and public disclosure
When the head of a New York-based investment firm was hospitalized for a heart condition, the executive took a very different approach from Apple co-founder Steve Jobs' own health-related disclosure.Lazard CEO Bruce Wasserstein felt little push-back from investors after he recently issued a short but poignant message, stating that he was hospitalized for an irregular heartbeat. "His condition is serious," the note said, "but he is stable and recovering."
It was a very different approach from the one taken at Apple early this year. In January, after months of rumors with no public response, Jobs ceded control of day-to-day operations. He returned to work in June after receiving a liver transplant.
In a new report from The Wall Street Journal, Michael Corkery examined the effect differing levels of disclosure had on the stock prices of both companies. His conclusion: "Openness can be healthy."
"The computer makers shares see-sawed when investors worried that the company was being less than forthcoming about the health of CEO Steve Jobs," the report said.
Apples secrecy surrounding the health of Jobs has had a major effect on Apple's stock price, while the open stance of Lazard resulted in a 1 percent drop. Throughout Jobs' career, Apple has been notoriously tight-lipped about the health of its chief and has always rebutted any questions about his health as being a "private matter." The report suggested that Wasserstein's more forthcoming approach was to his company's benefit.
"A CEO doesnt want his company's stock price to go up when he gets sick because it means investors dont consider him a critical asset," Corkery wrote. "But he doesnt want it to tank either. By being straightforward about Wassersteins illness, Lazard is enabling investors to decide for themselves about the possibility of a leadership change at the storied firm."
Jobs began to buck his secrecy trend at the beginning of this year with his open letter to Apple fans about his apparent weight loss and failure to show at the Macworld keynote. When he returned to the stage at Apples annual music event in September, Jobs acknowledged his health.
"So, Im vertical, Im back at Apple and loving every minute of it," he said, "and working with some talented teams to come up with some great products for the future."
On Topic: Investor
- Apple to distribute another $2.867 billion to shareholders via dividend
- Piper Jaffray: Concern of drooping sub-30% Apple margins is 'overblown'
- Today is last chance to get in on Apple's spring dividend
- Samsung's cash pile triples in one year, now worth $28.5B after debt
- Apple rewards finance chief with $69M pay in 2012, highest of any CFO





oops.
Want to write for AppleInsider? Submit your application now!



I dunno. It's 2 different industries. Jobs has always had a higher profile; heck, I didn't even know what this 'Lazard' was, much less who its CEO was. I don't think you can really compare the two.
Plus Apple has more of a cult-like following, rather than a business-like following. So I can see the paranoia more about Apple's CEO than most other companies.