Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Apple to appeal dismissal of federal FRAND suit against Motorola

Apple v. Motorola FRAND trial dismissal order from December.Source: U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin

Last updated

Coming on the heels of Google's agreement with the FTC, Apple on Friday filed a notice of appeal with a Wisconsin district court over its FRAND-related suit against Motorola, a case that was previously dismissed after the Cupertino company agreed to licensing terms laid out by the court.

While the filing itself is terse and reveals little of Apple's strategy, FOSS Patents' Florian Mueller notes the appeal could adversely affect Google's Motorola following Thursday's FTC consent order that bars the internet giant from seeking injunctive relief if FRAND rate-setting litigation is pending.

If Apple's appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is successful, the Motorola suit would likely be remanded to the Wisconsin district court from which it was dismissed in November.


Presiding Judge Barbara B. Crabb cancelled the trial on the day it was set to begin as the jurist was leery about the need for proceedings already prepared for by both parties and the court. Originally, Apple agreed to license Motorola's properties if the court-determined fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms set a royalty rate below one dollar per device.

The company also suggested the court set a similar rate for Apple's declared standard-essential patents based on the same principles. At the time, Motorola also argued that Apple's concessions would allow the company to later refuse to pay Apple royalties for standard essential patents.

Mueller points out that if Apple's appeal to the CAFC does not succeed, the company may be able to file a new FRAND determination action which would effectively bar Google from pursuing injunctive relief.



6 Comments

adrayven 13 Years · 460 comments

Correct me if I'm wrong, but Google is in trouble either way this one cuts, from the way it sounds?

dickprinter 17 Years · 1058 comments

Strictly based on the number of comments to this story, it's obvious that practically every AI member is tired of this court/lawsuit/FRAND BS.

kdarling 17 Years · 1639 comments

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adrayven 

Correct me if I'm wrong, but Google is in trouble either way this one cuts, from the way it sounds?

 

 

The FTC decision on essential patent licensing ...

 

  • forces both sides to avoid tying up things in litigation or injunctions, and 
  • if they cannot come to terms fairly quickly,  to accept a third party's (judge or arbiter) royalty rate determination.

 

So now neither side can avoid making a deal.

 

The probable result is that Apple will pay more than they wanted to, and Motorola will get less than they asked.  

 

In any case, Motorola gets income from Apple's sales, which is an advantage of SEPs... they're nearly impossible to design around, unlike non-essential patents like bounceback.

 

And perhaps both sides will need fewer lawyers in the future.

hill60 17 Years · 6976 comments

[quote name="Dickprinter" url="/t/155313/apple-to-appeal-dismissal-of-federal-frand-suit-against-motorola#post_2254477"]Strictly based on the number of comments to this story, it's obvious that practically every AI member is tired of this court/lawsuit/FRAND BS. [/quote] Either that or there isn't much to say about something that is as inevitable as the sun rise.

timon 20 Years · 151 comments

What should happen is so simple. If your patented whatever is use for an industry standards, i.e., FRAN, then the royalty schedule has to be published and everyone pays at that rate. In addition it should be just added to the cost of the chip and not to the device. Lets stop all of the BS.